Brief review of the Logitech G413 TKL SE mechanical keyboard

Tech Life

When I purchased my M2 Pro Mac mini, I didn’t want to reuse peripherals I had lying around for my new setup. I bought a new display, new keyboard, and a new mouse not because I was feeling wasteful, but because I wanted to create a specific setup that could prove useful for my type of work, and which could have a minimal footprint because space is always at a premium on my main desk.

I talked more at length about this setup back in June 2023; what I can say after 9 months is that, overall, I’m quite satisfied with it. The portrait LG display has been a particularly good choice, and it’s great to work with a lot of text documents with such a display.

The Razer Basilisk V3 X Hyperspeed mouse has served me well, too. I knew it would because I had already purchased one for my Legion 7i gaming laptop. However I must add that it’s not the sturdiest I’ve owned. One day it accidentally fell from my desk. It was just a 72cm drop, yet the impact caused an internal component (the metallic part that comes in contact with the negative pole of the AA battery) to become loose. The mouse is still functional, I just need to be more careful when replacing the battery and ensure that a proper contact is established.

The major letdown has been the keyboard. The Razer Blackwidow V3 Mini Hyperspeed (which I’ll refer to as “Razer B‑V3-MH” for brevity from now on) is an attractive 65% keyboard with nice-feeling linear and silent switches. Created as a gaming keyboard, it is supposed to be sturdy and have several gaming-friendly features, such as anti-ghosting, ultra-responsive input, durable keys and switches, and so forth.

Unfortunately, after three months or so, this keyboard developed an annoying issue that only got more and more annoying over time, to the point that I couldn’t work with it or around it anymore: keys began to repeat randomly, leading to dual typing or triple typing even. I had to slow down my typing speed to avoid hhavving seentenncess lloook likee thiis. I need precision for my work. It’s also a nightmare with passwords, as you can imagine.

This issue is not isolated. Some using the Razer B‑V3-MH on PC claim that a firmware update greatly mitigated the problem, others say it didn’t. Someone else in that afore-linked forum thread said:

I finally found a solution for that. This is not a software issue but a mechanical one. Just remove the keycaps (keyboard off), and put few drops of isopropylic alcohol on the switch and spam it so that the liquid penetrates well. Let it dry 30/40 min. The operation work fine for me (double E typing every time). If this could help some and prevent them from throwing away their keyboard or worse buying a new one from razer.

If razer reads this: beautiful keyboards shouldn’t hide a shitty conception, no need to guarantee 50M hits when they barely do 10%.

Exactly. We’re talking about a €180 keyboard. Not ultra-deluxe or artisanal mechanical keyboard pricing, but not cheap either. A keyboard like this shouldn’t present these issues so early.

And don’t get me started on the fact that Razer refuses to provide their software applications for the Mac platform. Good thing I also have Windows PCs, otherwise updating this keyboard’s firmware would be a problem.

Anyway, last month I decommissioned the Razer B‑V3-MH for good. Maybe I’ll try the trick quoted above, when I have time. With the Razer keyboard gone, I had to find a replacement, and quickly.

I love mechanical keyboards, and I know there are a lot of well-made models out there that are superior to Razer’s products. I constantly keep an eye on Drop’s mechanical keyboards section and I receive the latest updates via email. I could lose hours or even days patiently sifting through custom mechanical keyboards, but the cold truth is that I hate group purchases and I hate to basically pre-order something that I can’t personally try and have to wait 4 months before it gets to my doorstep.

On the other hand, finding suitable keyboards in local brick & mortar shops hasn’t been easy either. Typically you find a lot of inexpensive ‘office PC’ membrane keyboards, some flat, Apple-looking offerings, and gaming keyboards from Razer, Corsair, Steelseries, and similar brands.

I was looking for a small-footprint mechanical keyboard, possibly with wired and wireless connections, to avoid cables and having a USB port on my Mac mini permanently taken. The hunt was proving fruitless. Then I found a good-enough candidate, the Logitech G413 TKL SE. I was able to try one at a local department store and — while I still think the keys of the Razer Blackwidow keyboards feel better — I found the G413’s keys to have a surprisingly good feel and feedback; and I found the G413’s build to be surprisingly good for a keyboard that costs €68. It’s about 1/3 of the price of the Razer B‑V3-MH, but honestly the latter doesn’t feel like a three-times superior product.

Logitech G413 TKL SE mechanical keyboard

The store was out of stock for the G413, so I turned to Amazon, and I was lucky enough to find it for a slightly discounted price. I paid €59 and got it the next day.

This is a tenkeyless keyboard, meaning it’s like a standard extended keyboard except it doesn’t have the numeric keypad. This makes it slightly bigger than the Razer B‑V3-MH, though its general footprint doesn’t make it that much bigger. The G413 is slightly lighter, too, at 650 grams against the 725 grams of the Razer B‑V3-MH. It’s nonetheless heavy enough that it doesn’t move around as you type.

It only comes with a wired, USB 2.0 connection, and while I would have really preferred a wireless option, at the end of the day this wasn’t a huge deal-breaker.

As per the manufacturer’s specs sheet, the Logitech G413 TKL SE features tactile mechanical switches, 6‑key rollover anti-ghosting, PBT keycaps and durable aluminium alloy build. It also has only white backlighting. Compared to the Razer B‑V3-MH, it’s a less sophisticated product if you will, and has a more spartan feel, but I actually don’t mind it. Having only white backlighting is okay for me, I’m not really a fan of and I don’t quite understand the RGB backlighting obsession in gaming products.

About the switches, I’ll steal this quote from The Verge’s review of the keyboard:

The Logitech G413 TKL SE might use Cherry MX-style switches, but they’re not original Cherry models. Instead, they’re Longhua switches made by Kaihua. There’s also only one choice of switch, “Tactile,” which is roughly equivalent to Cherry’s MX Brown switches. There are no linear or clicky options here, and nor is the G413 TKL SE hot-swappable, meaning you’ll have to use a soldering iron if you want to change its switches.

The part of that review I most disagree with, however, is about the typing feel:

Unfortunately, these switches simply don’t feel as nice to type on as more premium keyboards and are the main place you feel the Logitech G413 TKL SE’s affordable price tag. As a whole, it can feel a little rattly. Keypresses generate hollow thuds rather than crisp taps, and the switches just feel off in a way I struggle to put my metaphorical, if not physical, finger on.

Sure, there are a lot of better mechanical keyboards out there, with better switches and better typing feel, but after a month of use, I can’t say this feels like a cheap keyboard. I don’t find it ‘rattly’, and while it’s true that keypresses can sound a bit hollow, the switches don’t feel particularly ‘off’ to me. And more premium keyboards can be hit-and-miss too. Perhaps most mechanical keyboard nerds won’t consider Razer keyboards premium products, but they certainly don’t have consumer prices. And they have their share of issues.

What’s important is that I’m finally back to typing quickly and accurately, and I haven’t encountered any issues with the G413 TKL SE. The keys feel homogeneous, both when pressed and in the acoustic feedback they produce. The font used for the keys is nice and legible (no sci-fi themed gaming crap). And overall I’m liking the tenkeyless layout more than Razer B‑V3-MH’s 65% layout. I like having separate Function keys on the upper row, and the little island on the right with the arrow keys and the Insert/Delete, Home/End, Page Up/Page Down pairs.

€59 is the least I have paid for a mechanical keyboard, but even at €68 or $70, I think it’s still good value for the money. It may make a mechanical keyboard connoisseur raise their brow, but from a pragmatic standpoint, I find the G413 TKL SE to be an honest, dependable, functional option.

People and resources added to my reading list in 2023

Tech Life

This is the eleventh edition of my annual overview of the most interesting discoveries made during the previous year, whether it’s been a blog worth reading, a creator on YouTube worth following, or a cool website/resource. As a tradition, this overview used to be published every January, mostly as a sort of last look in the rearview mirror at the closing year before moving on to the new one.

This time I’m breaking the pattern, and publishing this towards the end of March, instead. My schedule is a bit off due to reasons I explained in my previous update, but at the same time I have to say that 2023 was a strange year overall. I’ve often mentioned this low tide brought up by a general feeling of ‘tech fatigue’; as a consequence, last year my interest in adding technology-related sources to my reads was rather low. I even neglected to stay up-to-date with the people and blogs I was already following.

2023: breaking patterns, tech exhaustion, and where to go from there

During 2023, my whole routine of staying informed with everything happening in tech ended up pretty much shattered. Before, I used to try my best to reach the equivalent of ‘inbox zero’ in my RSS feeds, but last year’s exhaustion made me really wonder whether all this information absorption was actually worthwhile. I started noticing the same effects of overexposure to news and newscasts. When I was living with my parents, morning and evening newscasts were the unavoidable daily ritual, and in the household there was this idea that basically you’re not living your life properly if you don’t stay up-to-date with what’s happening around you. That not following the news isn’t smart, and so forth. 

The problem of course is that what you see through a newscast isn’t a balanced snapshot of the world around you. You’re mostly fed pieces of news about what’s exceptional, and for the most part this focuses on what’s exceptionally negative. What makes the news is 50 people dead in a building’s fire, not the 5,000 people of that neighbourhood whose life goes on as usual. In the end, overexposure to news and newscasts just overwhelms your worldview with depressing negativity. This, in turn, fills you with a constant sense of dread, alternated with bouts of anxiety. The first thing I did when I started living on my own was to get rid of the TV. At the time, Internet was still innocent enough that I could use it to retrieve the information I needed to catch up with what was happening around me, without the daily shower of negative news thrown in my face. This was obviously before social networks effectively turned into newscasts.

While overexposure to tech, tech news, and tech debates hasn’t exactly brought the same sense of dread and the same kind of anxiety as the overexposure to newscasts, it certainly created a feeling of exhaustion and also a renewed criticism towards how we talk about technology today. Just as what you see through a newscast isn’t a balanced snapshot of the world around you, what you get from following the news and debates in technology isn’t a balanced snapshot of the actual situation. Apart from ‘objective’ bits of news, like product announcements, new technological breakthroughs, and the like, everything else in the tech discourse is pretty much biased and unbalanced. It’s the us-versus-them mentality wherever you look. When you realise this, when it finally hits you that — except for a few sources who steadfastly maintain their integrity — the tech discourse keeps going through its motions all the time, your enthusiasm really goes out the window. You start noticing how the same pundits keep reacting the same way; you start recognising their bias; you re-evaluate their assessments. Cynicism and scepticism are necessary evils in tech if you want to keep thinking critically, but your daily tech soup will definitely taste more sour.

This exhaustion stage, this tech burnout, is necessary as well. I’m more and more convinced that more people ought to reach this stage, to then try to approach tech in a different — hopefully healthier — way. Because the next stage is to focus on whatever good remains out there after the squeeze. That’s why I’m trying to approach 2024 with the goal of finding out who and what’s really worth following, who and what is truly distinctive, who and what is ultimately worth my (and your) time. Mind you, it’s what I’ve always been trying to do when compiling these yearly overviews; the only little thing that has changed is that from now on I’ll try to be even more selective. 

Blogs

I know, that was a bit of a long introduction, but it was necessary to explain why, this time, the list of sources added to my feeds is going to be quite short overall — maybe shorter than it’s ever been.

Tech

This category was this close to remaining empty. However in November 2023 I discovered Manuel Moreale — or rather, he discovered me through another person, and got in touch. And I, in turn, was made aware of his very good blog. I really like his down-to-earth, no-nonsense approach, and I’ve been enjoying one of the main features of his website — the weekly interviews for the People and Blogs newsletter. 

Full disclosure: Manuel interviewed me as well, and at the time of writing this my interview hasn’t been published yet. I’m not highlighting Manuel’s blog as a favour to him, or for self-serving purposes. I genuinely like his blog, and I think it’s a worthy addition to your RSS feeds. Simple as that.

Addendum, just before hitting the Publish button

Two honourable mentions I haven’t actually added to my RSS feeds, but kept in my browsers’ bookmarks. The reason is that these two blogs are a bit on the technical side, but occasionally talk about things I’m interested in.

  • Niki’s blog tonsky.me — I discovered this when I was looking for more information about Syncthing, and encountered Niki’s article about it, Computers as I used to love them.
  • Julio Merino’s blog — Time ago on Twitter/X someone I follow retweeted a few tweets by Julio that piqued my interest; after an exchange with Julio, I ended up reading his article discussing in more depth what he was talking about in that Twitter thread: Fast machines, slow machines. I found both the article and the blog quite interesting, therefore worth bookmarking.

Photography

Casual Photophile — This isn’t exactly a resource I discovered in 2023; I think I stumbled on it a couple of years before, and I could have sworn I already mentioned it in these annual overviews, but checking the previous editions nothing came up. I probably just forgot to add it. Anyway, this is a really, really good photography-oriented website/blog. The focus is mainly on film photography, but digital is discussed as well. News, and mostly reviews of cameras and lenses, written with the necessary depth that comes from passionate people. Definitely recommended.

The Machine Planet — About 10–12 years ago, when I was deep, deep into my path of rediscovery of film photography, someone somewhere mentioned an article by Dante Stella I should check. I wish I remembered who suggested what and where. I don’t even remember the specific article. What I remember is entering the (now old and discontinued) website of Dante Stella, reading that article, then being so captivated by his writing style and his way of presenting and discussing photography that I bookmarked the site right away. He never updated the site with much frequency, but that didn’t matter, as I would return to just re-read some of his articles and refresh my memory about his opinion on a certain piece of camera equipment, etc. I was glad to see he persisted with his writing by opening a new blog, The Machine Planet. Stella is an excellent photographer, and an excellent photography writer, to the point that, more than once, I’ve been inspired both by his photography and his writing. 

YouTube channels

There has been a lot of subscribing and unsubscribing in 2023, as some channels I discovered gave me a good initial impression but then I lost interest. 

Watches & horology

You may not know this, but clocks and watches are probably my oldest interest, as I was utterly fascinated with them since I was a little boy. For an all too brief period of my life I was even apprentice to a watchmaker. Then, as time passed, this interest never really turned into a passion, and sort of remained in the periphery, as writing and photography stayed front and centre. I got into watches again after my mother’s passing, as I inherited a couple of interesting items that sent me through a rabbit hole of horologic research. And so my dormant interest was rekindled. 

When you start looking for YouTube material on the subject, you definitely end up in another rabbit hole. There’s a lot of stuff, a lot of channels, a lot of different personalities and, yes, even influencers. (Ten years ago, the motto was, There’s an app for that; today I think we can all agree that There’s an influencer for that). Over the course of late 2022 up to now, I’ve checked out, subscribed, and unsubscribed to many watch-related channels. I’ll just list the ones I seem to return to more often, in no particular order of preference.

Teddy Baldassarre — Probably the channel with the widest scope, with videos about watches for all kinds of budgets. Teddy is a passionate host, and a rare combination of quantity + quality. You can find single watch reviews, comparisons, watch suggestions according to different budgets, opinion videos about the watch world, mini-documentaries about specific brands, and so forth. A really diverse selection of content, all quite enjoyable.

The Urban Gentry — Watch reviews, critique, talks. ‘TGV’, the host, is charismatic and entertaining. My favourite videos are his chats with frequent guest engineer-turned-watch entrepreneur Marc Frankel of Long Island Watch, quite fun and informative.

Just the Watch — This channel is more focused on affordable watches and digital watches, since Dave the host is a Casio aficionado (like yours truly). I really enjoy Dave’s reviews: honest, balanced, concise but never superficial. He’s a nice, down-to-earth fellow; a pleasure to listen to.

Jenni Elle — Jenni’s channel is more about luxury brands and watch micro-brands I’ll never be able to afford. But she’s a joy to watch nonetheless (pardon the pun). Smart, fun, competent. I especially enjoy her chats with her husband (another watch nerd) about the watch world and market.

Britt Pearce — Britney’s strength, in my opinion, is that she created a watch channel that’s not snobbish or intimidating. She’s perhaps the most eclectic of this group. She produces fun, lighthearted videos that are just the right length when you want to watch something entertaining that doesn’t commandeer too much of your time. Essentially her message is that we can all enjoy watches without taking ourselves too seriously, and I strongly agree with the sentiment.

Music

Only one recommendation, but it’s a really good one:

Digging the Greats by Brandon Shaw. As the title suggests, here you’ll find a great mix of (modern) music history, breakdowns of entire albums, artists’ profiles, and so forth. Brandon is a remarkable host: passionate and knowledgeable, smart and entertaining. You can see by the way he produces and edits his videos that he’s pouring his soul into the work. If you like what he does, I suggest you support him on Patreon. In return you’ll get even better and extended versions of his videos, which he has to carefully edit to avoid all the related restrictions and copyright headaches faced by everyone trying to do music education on YouTube.

Podcasts

Another year, another round of copying-and-pasting the same quote from a couple of years ago:

In 2019 I unsubscribed from all the podcasts I was following, and I haven’t looked back. I know and respect many people who use podcasts as their main medium for expression. My moving away from podcasts is simply a pragmatic decision — I just don’t have the time for everything. I still listen to the odd episode, especially if it comes recommended by people I trust. You can find a more articulate observation on podcasts in my People and resources added to my reading list in 2019.

If you’re wondering why I keep the Podcast section in these overviews when I clearly have nothing to talk about, it’s because to this day I receive emails from people un-ironically asking me for podcast recommendations.

My RSS management

Again, nothing new to report on this front. The apps I’ve been using (and loving) on my several different devices are still the same, and I haven’t found better RSS management tools worth switching to. In my previous overviews, I used to list here all the apps I typically use to read feeds on my numerous devices, but ever since I broke my habit of obsessively reading feeds everywhere on whatever device, I’ll only list the apps on the devices I’ve used over the past year or so. If you’re curious to read the complete rundown, check past entries (see links at the bottom of this article):

  • On my M2 Pro Mac mini running Mac OS 13 Ventura, and on my 13-inch retina MacBook Pro running Mac OS 11 Big Sur: NetNewsWire.
  • On my Intel Macs running Mac OS 10.13 High Sierra: Reeder and ReadKit.
  • On my PowerPC Macs: older versions of NetNewsWire.
  • On my iPad 8: UnreadReederNetNewsWire for iOS, and ReadKit.
  • On my iPhone SE 3, iPhone 8, iPhone 7 Plus, iPhone 5s, iPhone 5, iPad 3: Unread. (Though on the iPad 3 Reeder seems to be more stable and less resource-hungry).
  • On older iOS devices: Older versions of Reeder, and an older version of Byline.
  • On my first-generation iPad: an older version of Newsify, which appears to be the only decent app still working on this device, as Slow Feeds (which is now called Web Subscriber), and the Feedly app itself have stopped working. Essentially, you can no longer properly authenticate and log into your Feedly account. It’s the same old problem — security certificates and vintage hardware don’t seem to like each other very much. I was able to make Newsify work by creating a ‘My Newsify’ account and importing all the feeds from Feedly.
  • On all my Windows machines I use FeedLab. It’s not a bad app at all, but I’m still looking for something more elegant visually. Nextgen reader used to be a great client, but development appears long discontinued.

Past articles

In reverse chronological order:

I hope this series and my observations can be useful to you. Also, keep in mind that some links in these past articles may now be broken. And as always, if you think I’m missing out on some good tech writing or other kind of resource you believe might be of interest to me, let me know via email, Twitter/X, or Mastodon. Thanks for reading!

Brief personal update

Tech Life

I have been receiving a few messages from readers of this site and people on social media, asking whether everything was all right, since I haven’t written much in a while. Also, since a terrible fire consumed an entire 138-apartment building on February 22 here in Valencia, some were really concerned about my and my family’s well-being. So, even though I don’t typically write personal updates, here I am again with another after the one I published in late November 2023.

The apartment building fire was horrific, and didn’t happen very far from where I live, but definitely far enough as to not impact my family and me in the slightest. 

As for the rest, things haven’t really changed since my November update. Back then I wrote:

Lately I’m just busier than the usual level of busy, and alternately fatigued and annoyed by technology. I’m also a lot behind my RSS feed reading, and when this happens, one frustrating consequence is that by the time I can write something in reaction to a certain piece of news or commentary, the debate (and inevitably the interest) around it has already died down. 

My RSS feed backlog remains disastrous to this day, and I’d like to apologise to people like Nick Heer and Michael Tsai — whose blogs usually have precedence in my reading list — for my recent lack of feedback. Their blogs have been getting better and better, and it’s not lack of interest on my part. Just lack of time.

In fact, the most important development behind the scenes, and the major factor robbing me of even more time has been the search of a new place to live. 

So far we have always lived in rented apartments, and the current lease is set to expire in March 2025. But our landlord passed away in December 2023, and the apartment we’re in was inherited by her three sons, who have jointly decided to sell it as soon as the lease expires. We made them two different purchase offers, but were both refused. (These people are not exactly poor, our offers were far from unreasonable — especially the second one — and based on the current state of the apartment, which is ‘nice’ but not ‘great’, but apparently and unsurprisingly, greed won over empathy and reasonableness one more time).

On the one hand, given that the lease expires a year from now, we’re lucky enough as not to have to look for a new home in a rush, as that usually ends up in hasty decisions you regret very quickly. On the other hand, we’re also not taking this too slowly. We have also decided to stop living in rented accommodations and to finally purchase a home. Unlike 15 years ago, we have a bit more savings in our accounts, but we’re also entering an age range where asking banks for a mortgage becomes a delicate affair. We’re not young newlyweds who can afford to ask for mortgages payable in 20 or 30 years, if you know what I mean. This has two important consequences: (1) Our budget is somewhat limited. (2) Time, absolutely speaking, is not exactly on our side. This naturally has had a major impact on the search of a suitable place to live.

So, together with work, whose pace has definitely increased in the past few months, there has been a lot of time devoted to apartment hunting, which is a painful and tedious process as you can imagine. Not to mention all the worrying that’s normally associated with a move: how to organise it, looking for boxes to put our stuff, taking more time to start sifting through our (many) belongings and deciding what to keep and what to get rid of. 

The apartment hunting is going well for now. At the time of writing we may have found a deal, but I’m not saying anything definitive until things have gone through completely, documents are signed, and money has passed hands. 

In short, this is a stressful, transitional period for me. The main subjects of this site — technology, design, interfaces, photography, and associated criticism — are still interesting and relevant for me; it’s just that lately I haven’t found enough time and attention to properly mull over them and write something meaningful. And I’m aching to do so. Perhaps I’ll manage to write a few brief posts in the immediate future, so if you don’t see a long-form piece from me in a while, now you know why.

Taking a step back to see better

Tech Life

Back in my university days, I used to haunt several bars and cafés near the university buildings with a few mates, students of literature and philosophy. We would typically choose a place to have lunch there at first, but often we ended up staying there all afternoon if we didn’t have other classes to attend. We would order more tea or coffee, study, compare notes, and so on. But the best part, the unforgettable part was the conversations. It’s that stage of your life where you feel you can make an impact on the world, where you feel you’re really understanding how the world works and you feel your intellectual ramblings can redefine entire aspects of society. You’re the generation ‘in charge’, you’re the thinker. Et cetera.

We loved to dissect theories, poetry, literary criticism, language, semantics, people’s behaviour… It was abstract at times, but also pragmatic and rooted in the here and now. During one of these conversations, I remember trying to link habits and interests. Or rather, trying to find a way to differentiate between interests mixed with passion, and interests tainted by habit. Don’t ask me why I had this urge. Perhaps my interlocutor was talking about interests and hobbies in a way I found too generic and shallow. I recall making drawings on a small Moleskine notebook, and talking about vectors. The interests+passion label had a big arrow pointing up, i.e. forward. The interests+habit label, instead, had an arrow on a circle, a loop.

And I know, it’s weird I still remember parts of this conversation so many years later, but my university days had a huge impact on my life, and so many details have remained with eerie vividness in my memory.

Anyway, at some point during that conversation, I said: Beware of loops. Loops kill you. With loops you don’t go anywhere. If you start feeling a loop, step back and try to refocus.

You mean routines. You mean the routine,” said my interlocutor.

But some routines are just part of life, I responded. My parents’ work schedule is rather fixed. It sorts of creates routines for them. They have to go to work at these hours, so they need to organise their day this way, go to bed at a certain hour, wake up at a certain hour, and so forth. The loops I’m talking about are sort of a thing of our own creation. They’re more similar to bad habits, little addictions with little voices we love to hear the sound of… Am I making sense?

With hindsight, I think I was trying to push some variant of the concept of echo chamber. Now, when you look up the definition of echo chamber (I’m using the Dictionary app on my Mac for convenience), it says:

  1. an enclosed space where sound reverberates.
  2. an environment in which a person encounters only beliefs or opinions that coincide with their own, so that their existing views are reinforced and alternative ideas are not considered.

What I was trying to convey when talking about loops, if I remember well, was something in between these two meanings, the literal and sociologic one. Something like an environment in which a person becomes so involved and enveloped in their interests and reverberations of such interests, that they lose sight of the actual importance of such interests and simultaneously of the actual influence these interests have on their worldview. That’s why I was talking about bad habits and little addictions.

This long-winded introduction serves to explain the eureka moment I had a few days ago. When it happened, I immediately felt myself inside the core of that constant feeling of tech fatigue I’ve been experiencing for the past couple of years at least.

My interest in technology over time has been slowly but steadily transforming into such a loop. I was getting more and more frustrated because I kept feeling the effects of this process, without being able to pinpoint the cause. I had to step back and try to refocus. Only I didn’t step back consciously. I sort of found myself distanced from the whole thing like two magnets rejecting each other. Tech fatigue acted like a rejecting force getting stronger with time.

I am now in a phase where I’m renegotiating the importance of technology after the sobering realisation of the influence it has been having over my life for the past 30+ years, but especially in the past five years or so. If I’m sounding like those people who left a cult and feel that only now they can really talk about the cult because they finally see it for what it is, that’s because yeah, in part it feels the same.

There are other interests that can become loops and trap yourself into them, like a tornado vacuuming everything it encounters on its path. Another example might be photography when all you do is obsess over gear, spend an unhealthy amount of time in online forums (maybe engaging in foolish battles over what’s the best mirrorless camera or what’s the perfect focal length for street photography), spend an inordinate amount of time watching photography-related videos on YouTube, ingest so much ‘latest news’ and articles on the topic, and so forth. You end up completely absorbed in the ‘photography world’ and perhaps feel good in the process… except that now you spend 90% of the time in that ‘photography world’ loop, and 10% actually taking photos. Whenever you take a genuine interest or hobby and nerdify the heck out of it, you lose yourself in its reverberations (remember that revised definition of echo chamber above) and become consumed by it. 

Don’t get me wrong, the pursuit of knowledge is a good thing. I’ve been intellectually curious my whole life. I love learning something new every day. What constantly pushes my curiosity is the idea that the more I know, the more I understand the world around me. But the way information flows today, the direction Internet and social media have taken today, it all points towards hyperspecialisation and obsessive-compulsive inflation of interests and hobbies. You become an expert in, say, military aircraft, and can recite all the specifications, background and development of the Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25, yet you have no idea where Hungary is, or what Newton theorised in 1684, or how to spell certain words in your own language. I’m making silly examples, perhaps, but the point is, you lack a healthy general knowledge background. 

Back to technology. The tech world today is particularly insidious because it’s become more than just an interest for many people. Given the way it has taken over in many aspects of our lives, it’s almost impossible to avoid its gravitational pull. It’s also almost impossible to prevent it from becoming a loop. The tech world is especially good at producing reverberations of its own shit. What tech companies and tech ‘celebrities’ do and say, the breakneck pace of tech news, the veritable oceans of digital ink produced daily to talk about such news, to comment on them, to comment on others’ comments on them… In Christopher Nolan’s 2010 masterpiece Inception, Cobb, the protagonist, is a skilled information extractor using the technique of entering the dream state and picking up valuable data and secrets from the target’s subconscious. During the film, we see a lot of this dream state. So many sequences that, if you were to stumble on the film halfway into it, you would believe were really happening and you would believe the characters are acting in the real world, and not in a shared dream reality. Sometimes the world of technology today feels like this. Some dimension that not only absorbs you and your time, but also alters your worldview and the way you think. And not always for the best.

I truly appreciated this article by Eric Schwarz back in November 2023 — or a ‘venting session’ as he calls it — and I hate that I’ve been so slow in acknowledging it here (I’ll probably address the reasons behind this latest hiatus in another post). 

Eric’s piece is aptly titled, When It’s Not Fun Anymore, and if I had to describe what it’s about in short, I’d say it’s Eric’s analysis of what has accumulated over the past few years to make him feel ‘tech fatigued’. It’s hard to quote from it, because it’s all quote-worthy. So many things resonated with me:

I think being an enthusiast about technology by default makes one an optimist […]

Instead, we’ve sort of gotten into this dystopian, late-stage capitalism doom loop [Oh look, that word again. — RM]. There’s idiotic billionaires acting like they’re the saviors of society through vanity projects, rather than the useful work of actual philanthropists of the past. There’s sometimes the assumption that anyone interested in tech wants to be like that. Every company is focused on “maximizing shareholder value” to the point that any joy and humanity is squeezed out of products. There’s no respect for users when it comes to privacy and being good stewards of our data — I had that hell with trying to delete accounts with some companies. In short, the monetization people won out and sometimes it feels like there’s no room for art or care.

I’m tired of everything seeming to get worse and more expensive, followed by patronizing emails explaining that this is better for me. For some businesses, the argument is “you can save money by using our app,” yet it wants access to every aspect of my phone. I’m sorry, but fast food doesn’t ever need to access my contacts or photo albums. In the past, I’ve been passionate about streaming services, as it seemed to be the dream of à la carte TV and mixed two things that I’m heavily interested in: tech and media. Instead of focusing on quality and content, it was a race-to-the-bottom to get subscribers, a proliferation of generic garbage (I’m looking at you Disney and Warner Bros. Discovery), and then price hikes and more price hikes. Ad-free tiers only exist to sort of tease us, while the money to be made is in ad-supported content. While I haven’t entirely unsubscribed en masse, it hurts to see the direction things are going in.

In terms of privacy, it’s frustrating how everything is becoming an inkjet printer or smart TV—a device that is a more tech-infused version of something we already know, yet the manufacturer can make it creepy and subscription-based. […]

Beyond that, we’ve gotten into a routine of buzzwords being the only driver of technology. I’m the last person to hate on new ideas, but we’ve had instance after instance of a solution looking for a problem and it’s just tiring. Cryptocurrency is terrible for the environment and proponents seem to think it can replace money when way too many retailers still haven’t moved on from magstripe card readers. NFTs seem like a way for influencers to drum up business. Artificial intelligence has some utility, but it’s exhausting to hear every company try to cram it into their sales pitch—I sat through a sales pitch for PCs at my day job and the manufacturer was trying to sell their bloatware as AI that will make my job easier. 

I apologise for quoting 80% of the article, but Eric really and succinctly sums up so many things that are just plain wrong with tech today. You wonder why we’re letting so much of this happen. My take is that many people are lost in the tech loop, lost in its reverberations, living the shared dream state of tech, jacked up in the Matrix thinking it’s the real world. Don’t think I’m passing judgment from my high horse here. Don’t think I’m being Neo or Morpheus (if we have to keep referencing the Matrix). Or rather, I am like Neo at his most confused phase in the first film of the franchise. 

If you start looking at the tech sphere this way, the increasing loss of common sense in online discourse begins to make sense. I still remember the absurd back-and-forth with a guy in a forum, where he was going on and on about how amazing it was to control all lights in his house from an app on his smartphone, and how cool it was that his smart fridge was keeping track of his calorie intake. (No, really, you can’t make this shit up.) What do you do when the light app drops support for your phone model? What do you do when the startup making the smart light solution files for bankruptcy and shuts everything down? What happens when your fridge breaks or loses the connection to the Internet? were some of my genuine, down-to-earth, objections. He thought I was the crazy one. And anyway his solutions to those potential issues were essentially to waste more money to keep those ‘smart’ solutions alive. If the light app drops support for his phone, well, apparently he will buy a newer phone. Let that sink in. Then ask yourself who’s the crazy one here.

Again, I’m doing my best not to sound pretentious or holier-than-thou, but I’ve come to a point where I think more and more people need to wake up, take a step back, and refocus. This is not the kind of ‘tech detox’ I did in the past for some periods of time, and it’s not the usual Oh god I feel so overwhelmed by my tech news feed lately, I need to take a break kind of detox either. It’s more like distancing myself from technology’s constant siren song to distinguish between what’s healthy knowledge and what’s just the product of the reverberations of the tech loop. 

At this point it’s fair to ask, So, what do you suggest one should do to distance themselves from tech in a good way? But I really don’t have satisfactory answers to that. I haven’t entered this extremely critical and distrustful phase towards the tech world by following a recipe or a method I sat down and devised myself. I just went progressively out of sync and out of tech’s orbit. Life coincidentally got in the way, too, by demanding a lot of my time elsewhere doing other stuff (work & worries, mostly, but not only that). So, less time to read my tech RSS feeds, very little time to watch tech YouTube, very little time to read tech news. At first I missed all of that quite badly. Now I distinctly feel that 90% of that was not really necessary — and I was already extremely selective of what I read and watched. 

Of course technology is not something you just ‘leave behind’. And it’s not the kind of advice I’m implying here. When you’re looking at a map and you realise you’re too zoomed in, what you do is zoom out and still look at the map to have a better idea of the bigger picture, literally. You don’t close the Google Maps tab in your browser or your Apple/Google Maps app on your device and swear you won’t look at another map in your life from now on. So many things in technology are advancing and permeating society because so many people are led to believe (by the loop! It’s always the loop!) that such things are good and totally harmless and have no side effects and it’s all ‘progress’. Being tech-illiterate today is not wise and is the first step towards being taken advantage of. This renegotiating phase I’m currently in is rather chaotic, and it’s difficult for me to give meaningful suggestions. I’ll share a small portion of an email I wrote to François, a reader of this site, back in May 2023 in response to an email he wrote me asking about “ways to balance the need to stay reasonably up-to-date with breaking changes and that to put enough distance between yourself and The News™ to stay creative and productive.”

This was part of my response:

If I had to summarise, I think I’d say it’s a bit like when you’re on a diet. You remove many foods that — while tasty and somewhat addictive — aren’t ultimately nutritious and, worse, are bad for your health. What I’ve been realising over time with the tech world is that there is a lot of, um, ‘tasty and somewhat addictive’ noise filling the space and making the signal harder to distinguish and pick up. So I constantly try to filter out all the noise and focus on what I think it’s the meatier stuff. 

One thing that helps is that I usually rely on selected trusted sources to stay reasonably up-to-date, so I don’t have to waste time reading a dozen different reviews or watching a dozen different videos about a product. There are exceptions, of course, especially when something potentially controversial appears. But at that point it’s clear that the matter requires more attention, and if it seems worthwhile to pay that more attention, then I’ll play along. Otherwise my attitude is more like “Yeah, okay, got it. Next!” 

This, in retrospect, makes me realise I was already on the right path, but that was probably not good enough all the same. To stay within the metaphor, I thought I was doing great with my ‘diet’, but I’ve come to realise I haven’t lost that much weight, really. 

Recently I’ve skimmed through a few blog articles talking about being optimistic about tech today, and I increasingly find fewer and fewer reasons to be so. There’s this overwhelming, nagging feeling that an increasing amount of things are getting out of hand, that greed is spreading from the top in so many aspects of technology, and too few people at the bottom are actually ‘voting with their wallet’, so their acts of protest are irrelevant in the grand scheme. Many are stupefied by the usual tide of latest-and-greatest gadgets. Many just shrug and don’t care, volunteering so much personal information and ‘productifying’ themselves in exchange for a small convenience in their daily lives. Being optimistic about tech ultimately means being optimistic about people and their will to jack themselves out of this Matrix. 

Good luck with that, my sceptic voice quips, as Apple is about to launch Vision Pro, designed to further draw you in.

A few thoughts about Humane’s Ai Pin

Tech Life

As I was gathering some notes for this piece and reading other people’s takes, I found myself in a very similar position as Jesper’s.

His article begins as follows:

The Humane Ai Pin has been announced, a phone alternative trying its best to not be a phone in any way. Humane famously spearheaded by ex-Apple luminaries Imran Chaudhri (with large amounts of the iPhone and multi-touch user experience to his name), Bethany Bongiorno (a Director of Software Engineering from the launch of the original iPad) and counting among its ranks Ken Kocienda (part of the initial Safari/WebKit team and designer of the first software keyboard and typing autocorrect), I’m finding myself wondering what I’m missing. 

There are a lot of people in Humane’s personnel who have an impressive background in understanding user interfaces and human-machine interaction. There are a few aspects of the Ai Pin I find fairly interesting, and I think they nailed both the hardware design of the device, and its wearability. I also think that the concept of the Pin, in its most abstract sense, is pretty intriguing. I’ve always believed that technology and machines should serve people and adapt to their needs, instead of the other way round. So, when at the beginning Humane vaguely hinted at working on something following this philosophy, my interest was piqued. I think smartphones have done a lot of good to society, but also a lot of harm when it comes to the interpersonal sphere. And whenever I’ve had the time to be at my most contemplative, I’ve often thought about what is the next step beyond smartphones. That’s why I was very interested in Humane’s intents and projects. Again, these people are not amateurs at all. Let’s hear them out.

When mentions of this upcoming device being fully ‘AI’-powered started to appear, my interest started waning a little. But wait — I said to myself — perhaps Humane has found an innovative way to make ‘AI’ work. Some kind of left-field implementation. Who knows. 

Then the Ai Pin was announced and demoed. And my reaction was just like that famously memetic GIF of the Star Trek character Jean-Luc Picard, with his resigned, frustrated facepalm.

For me, the most ironic aspect of what doesn’t work with the Ai Pin is that it underwhelms in the two main departments I least expected it to underwhelm: user interface and human-machine interaction. 

I know nothing about the thought process the people at Humane went through to bring forward the idea of the Pin, but I suspect that a lot of analysis about how people use and interact with smartphones was involved. They must have asked themselves, What can we do to go beyond this?What do we feel is wrong with the way people interact with their phones, and what can we do to improve things?What kind of human-device interaction can make things smoother and frictionless but also make the relationship less device-centric, less addictive? — You know, questions like these. It’s rather clear to me that they wanted to come up with a device that could be out of the way as much as possible but also be as useful in assisting users so that they would not miss using a smartphone.

This intent, this design, is worthy of praise. This is difficult territory. I know well all the little things that annoy me about smartphones, the way they’re used, the way I use mine, and I’m sure everyone has their peeves. But if someone asked me point-blank what kind of device or interface or interaction I would create to solve the issue, to make things better, less tech-addictive and more human-focused, I wouldn’t know what to say.

If I were given more time, I’d probably try to start with something people would familiarise with in no time and interact with in ways that are even easier and more intuitive than taking out a smartphone and fiddling with it. Maybe this, too, was something Humane considered in their brainstorming sessions. And maybe the Ai Pin is what they consider a good answer to such proposition.

But from what I’ve seen in the demonstrations showing how to use the Ai Pin, this device doesn’t seem all that intuitive and easy to pick up, and it doesn’t seem to be more frictionless than using a smartphone. It also faces the basically insurmountable challenge of winning over people who have accumulated years of smartphone-centric habits. But even I — who am terrible at marketing and predicting technology trends — understand that people only change their habits if the reward is receiving more comfort and convenience. The Ai Pin brings awkwardness in every sense of the term, and little else.

Oversimplifying, the Ai Pin is like having a Siri‑, Alexa‑, or Google Assistant-powered smart home device always with you. You wear it. The main form of interaction is you asking it to do things for you or to retrieve information you need. You have to talk to it. There is no really tangible interface. Any visual interaction may happen with a UI that is laser-projected on the palm of your hand. While you’re reading this, do this quick thought-experiment and ask yourselves, Would I seek to purchase such a device solely based on this description? Would I ditch my iPhone or Android phone for such a device? Yeah, I thought as much. 

Ever since Siri was introduced in 2011, I talked about how fundamentally sceptical I am regarding voice-only interaction with this type of virtual assistants. (It’s hard to find short quotes, but you should go back and read Siri’s fuzziness and friction from 2015 and more importantly A few stray observations on voice assistants from 2018).

  • They’re essentially black boxes, which is a real problem when it comes to feedback. Can I just talk to them in plain language? Do I need to use some kind of formulaic pattern so that my requests have a higher chance to be recognised and acted upon? Does the Assistant understand concatenated questions? (You ask question 1. Assistant responds. You ask question 2 based on the Assistant’s response to question 1. Is the Assistant still ‘following’ you or has it reset?) How does the Assistant handle ambiguity in language and speech?
  • This can lead to friction in the interaction, and I suppose things are not that different from what happens with Siri already (which has been happening since Siri appeared): like I wrote in Siri’s fuzziness and friction, “Siri is the kind of interface where, when everything works, there’s a complete lack of friction. But when it does not work, the amount of friction involved rapidly increases[…]”
  • Another by-product of being black boxes is their reliability. Both regarding how they handle communication failures, and regarding how reliable, i.e. trustworthy, is the information they relay. In these products’ demo videos everything happens flawlessly. In real life, virtual assistants misunderstand you more often than not. Like my dad had suggested in the conversation I reported in my afore-linked piece A few stray observations on voice assistants, “Reliability must be put first with these assistants. They ought to understand you at once, and if they don’t, they ought to allow you to correct them as quickly as possible. Otherwise they’re just like that subordinate at the office who is supposed to help you do the work, but he doesn’t understand or misunderstands what you want him to do, and you end up doing more work to fix the misunderstandings.” 
  • The Ai Pin requires a lot of trust on the part of the user. The user must be comfortable wearing a device which essentially constantly monitors its surroundings. And, as hinted above, the user has to trust any response coming from the Pin. Showing that you can hold some almonds and ask the Pin whether you can eat them or not is a cool interaction. But should we trust its response to be factual and correct? Some have already pointed out that in a few usage examples of the Ai Pin made by Humane, the Pin gave incorrect responses, which isn’t exactly trust-building.

Before this list grows and grows, let’s stop for a moment and focus on what I consider the fundamental point of failure of this device (and other similarly-working assistants): people don’t like and don’t want to interact with devices via voice commands and voice-based interaction. They just don’t. There are exceptions at the extremes of the spectrum, like spoiled tech bros on one side, and people with disabilities on the other. But the vast majority of regular people find this kind of interaction awkward, fatiguing, uncomfortable (especially in public) and ultimately inefficient. For the past ten years or so I have accumulated a fair amount of data through personal observation but also through repeated surveys targeting different demographics in the part of the world where I live, and the results have never changed. Only a negligible sample of people use these virtual assistants with some frequency. The vast majority still prefers doing things themselves: setting timers, choosing and changing music, looking for places to eat, checking their schedule, finding the shortest route to their destination. In other words, they like to be and feel in control, they find that taking out their smartphone or tablet and checking things themselves is way quicker than asking stuff to a virtual assistant the right way so that they can extract a meaningful response, and they really really don’t like talking out loud to an inanimate object.

I was talking with a friend recently about this subject, and during our chat another important aspect of this kind of voice-based interaction came to light — and it further explains why a lot of people find it fatiguing. It’s information retention on the part of the user. In the Ai Pin showcase page on Humane’s website, the Catch me up feature is presented like this: Simply say “Catch me up,” and your Ai Pin does all the work of sifting your texts and calls to give you the essence of what you need to know — and saving you precious time for what’s important. The response may vary according to how busy you are and what’s going on at the moment in your life, but I suppose that when you prompt the Pin this way, you’ll still receive a fair amount of information. How much of it will you actually remember? 

I don’t think I’m alone in preferring to go through my stuff myself, using a device where the information is presented clearly and can be interacted with easily and directly, and take note of what’s important. It may take longer, but I end up retaining more information in the process. It’s a more satisfying experience. Perhaps I may miss something, but given the black box nature of these devices, how sure can you be that they have caught everything there was to catch?

The Ai Pin makes the same conceptual mistake behind all the assistants that preceded it: to treat all people as if they were so utterly helpless and clueless to manage even basic stuff. And to grossly miscalculate which tasks people find tedious and willing to delegate to a machine. These assistants want to assist with stuff people have no problem doing themselves, and they do so through an interaction model that ultimately makes things more awkward, impractical, and longer to accomplish. (On the other hand, it’s a good interaction model for people who have different types of motoric or visual disabilities and need assistance when sending and receiving messages, collecting information, etc.). 

Perhaps it’s too early to say, but I strongly feel a certain similarity between the Ai Pin and Google Glass. Like I previously noted in A few stray observations on voice assistants:

It has been pointed out how Google Glass has turned out to be a failed attempt as a general-purpose device aimed at the general public, but a more successful one in limited, specialised applications and environments. I believe voice assistants have started with the wrong foot […] I think that if voice assistants had been originally designed having people with disabilities as first and sole target audience (instead of lazy tech dudes), and then gradually extended to everyone else, today they’d be a bit better. 

And:

[T]here’s a big difference when your goal is to develop a tool that makes your life-as-an-able-bodied-person easier (read: spoiled) instead of a tool that makes the life of a disabled person more tolerable. Your able-bodied person’s ‘friction’ is bullshit compared to the real friction of a person with any disability. A useful virtual assistant is one that, first and foremost, addresses a few crucial types of impairments. Design with that in mind, give precedence to solving problems related to the interaction between a person with impairments, develop against those, test against those, then worry about perfectly healthy twenty-somethings who are too inconvenienced to manually select the music they want to play. 

Instead there’s this urge to create The Next Big Thing that will be a hit for everyone, everywhere. And to create it in one fell swoop, skipping all the steps that might help you really get there.

And this insistence on treating ‘AI’ (in quotes, because artificial intelligence doesn’t exist) as a panacea for everything is as misguided as it is tiring. In wanting to feed these hungry ‘AI’ Black Boxes with all kind of data, and especially personal, sensitive data, we are quickly and surely creating that Big Brother George Orwell warned us about in his novel 1984. A novel that, I feel, is more cited than actually read and understood.

At the end of the day, like my friend and I were saying in our chat, what comes after the smartphone has to be something that it’s better, more pleasant to use, easier to interact with, more efficient in use, and providing an even more fulfilling experience. A device like the Ai Pin doesn’t fit this description, at least in its current state.

Back to his piece, Jesper wonders:

The Humane Ai Pin didn’t happen by chance and was not lazily extracted from between the couch cushions. A lot of talented people spent a lot of time at it, clearly chasing a deep vision.

So why does it seem so terribly, undeniably off?

My theory — and it’s just that, a theory — is that this final product isn’t exactly the embodiment of Humane’s original idea. That’s what feels off to me, for the most part. I may be completely wrong about this, but the more I look at it, the more I feel that Humane had a much more ambitious concept in the design phase than essentially putting Alexa in an iPod shuffle, but the technology they would have had to put inside it was perhaps still out of reach, or it would have been so expensive to implement and deploy that they would need to give the final product a price tag so ridiculous nobody would buy it. At $700, the Ai Pin is already a hard sell as it is.