Photographer, mind thy backpack

Handpicked

Source: Sneak Peek — Lowepro’s New DSLR Video Fastpack AW — The Digital Story

Derrick writes:

When you look at the new DSLR Video Fastpack, you see a next generation backpack that’s evolved from the original (and popular) Fastpack. With the current model, Lowepro has updated both the design and function. The official announcement is just days away. But I’ve been using a test model for nearly 3 months, and I’m going to show you some of the features that have impressed me.

  • Clever Fastpack Access that combines easy entry for your gear when you need it, yet allows you to keep it protected and organized during transport.
  • Lightweight, Stylish Design that doesn’t attract attention in urban settings. Even the Lowepro logo is stitched with black thread to downplay recognition.
  • All Weather Cover that is stored in the bottom of the pack, but can be quickly deployed to cover the entire bag in just seconds. Helps protect gear from the elements.
  • Side Mount Tripod Holder that accommodates tripods, monopods, or DSLR video rigs.
  • Built-in Laptop/Tablet Sleeve that provides quick access to your computer, yet protects it when not in use.
  • Well-Designed Storage Compartments to keep both camera gear and personal items neatly stowed.
  • Audio Organizer Pouch to tame those cords from microphones and the rest of your sound gear.
  • Hide Away Hip Belt Storage for you when don’t need the hip belt and want it out of your way.

I’ve been using Lowepro products since 2006 and I love them. What I appreciate most is their build quality and intelligent design. I’ve always preferred smaller bags, but over the years my camera collection has grown, and I was looking for something bigger but practical at the same time. I think I’ll get this new Fastpack as soon as it’s available. Go read the whole article for more photos and information. If you’re serious about your gear, you’ll love this.

Content on demand

Tech Life

This place was launched a little more than two months ago. Feedback has been generally poor so far, where by ‘poor’ I mean both quantitatively and qualitatively. With the usual exceptions, of course. Also, by ‘feedback’ I mean email messages sent to me privately, not public comments. Among the emails I received, albeit few and far between, I nonetheless noticed some sort of trend slowly building up again. It’s the same trend I started noticing when I was publishing The Quillink Observer and my Italian-only tech blog Autoritratto con mele before that.

It seems that when a weblog about any specific topic starts gathering an audience of constant readers, there are always people among them who treat your blog as a TV channel, and write you ‘requests’ or give you unsolicited advice. Like: I value your opinion: that’s why I think you should write more software reviews or You don’t get enough traffic because you don’t always talk about the stuff other tech pundits are talking about or Everybody’s talking about Windows 8, when are you planning to join the debate?

When the issue is not related to the content itself, it’s about frequency: Love your site, but you should definitely post more frequently. Gotta keep them entertained. [Note: I’m not making this stuff up. These are all real excerpts.]

Sometimes these requests or pieces of advice are surrounded by appreciative statements, in a (failed) attempt to sound less harsh or demanding (note that I value your opinion above, for instance). What I hear is I want you to talk about the things I like and the things I want.

Here’s the thing, though. Firstly, I have this strange tendency to talk about things I have some knowledge of. Secondly, but not less importantly, there are topics which I’m not particularly interested in discussing, no matter how close they are to other topics I instead care about. For instance, being interested in user interfaces and usability doesn’t mean being interested in everything that has been written about it or that is being discussed lately. And what’s more, it doesn’t mean I have an opinion on everything related to user interfaces and usability.

If you follow the tech world and keep up-to-date with the various topics of the day or debates of the week, you may be disappointed by their absence in these pages. When I don’t talk about something ‘big’, it’s not that I’m not aware of it or that I don’t keep myself up-to-date. Usually the reasons for my silence about it are, in no particular order:

  1. I’m not really interested in it.
  2. I’m interested in it, but don’t know enough of it to have an opinion or a series of observations worth sharing.
  3. Some other people have already done a good job at analysing it, and I’ve nothing substantial to add. (In this case, I might link to someone else’s article, unless the source is as obvious as Daring Fireball).
  4. It’s certainly an interesting topic, but perhaps I feel it’s too soon to discuss because of an evident lack of factual information about it. (E.g. rumours, software at its very early stage of development, vapourware, etc.)

As I’m rationalising this, I’m realising that the most frequent reasons of my unwillingness to speak about some topic du jour are 2. and 4. I think we’re all already being flooded with constant chatter about rumours, software/hardware which is not even out of alpha stage but everybody has to say something about it, services which aren’t yet ready to launch but everybody seems to be already dispensing their judgment on the matter. And I should join the debate?

You see, I think that one of the biggest problems of the tech sphere is that in the whole process of ‘keeping folks informed’, too often theories and opinions get mixed with factual information and data even before said information and data are definite and ready for analysis. You know the drill: there’s some announcement about an upcoming product, and in giving you the story about the announcement, pundits are already passing judgment, foreseeing trends, babbling about strategies, playing ‘Armchair CEO’, and so on. Then there are rumours about a product, and long discussions about possible features, possible uses, possible problems, etc. etc. Then the product is finally introduced, and if you’ve kept track of all the previous nonsense you’ll realise that a good 80% of those ‘opinions’ and ‘analyses’ were completely off the mark, but the same guys are now talking again about the product, often course-correcting themselves. Few notice that, some pundits get away with it, and the wheels keep spinning. (Okay, this is a more general problem, but I’m focussing on the tech world now).

As Sherlock Holmes famously reminds Dr Watson in A Scandal in Bohemia, “It is a capital mistake to theorise before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts”. That above is a game I won’t play. And a mistake I’m doing my best to avoid.

“Not today.”

Et Cetera

We are living in the age of Performance and Productivity. Never before have I witnessed such an obsession over speed. Everything is accelerated and at such maddening pace we’re only able to realise it when we can’t keep up with it. We realise it’s unhealthy only when our health sends us alarming signals we cannot ignore.

Whenever I explain what I do for a living to people who don’t know me very well, the general consensus is that I’m ‘lucky’ to be working from home because, among other things, I don’t have a strict working hours’ schedule. Yes, it’s nice to have the freedom of getting up at 11 in the morning and not having to go to an office somewhere, with the added stress of commuting (either by driving there and then back home, or by using public transportation). But it’s a blessing and a curse, and I have to remind my interlocutors of the flip side: that often you don’t realise when it’s time to stop working or generally ‘doing stuff at the computer’.

For me personally, the problem is even more exacerbated by the fact that both my job and my creative endeavours involve sitting at my desk. And reading a lot of things online is both beneficial to my job and to my inspiration for, say, writing an article here or a short story. When my workload is in high-tide mode, the amount of hours I spend at the computer is ridiculously, embarrassingly high. Today, an increasing number of independent professionals who work from home are in the very same boat. My advice is, don’t reduce rest to an afterthought. Don’t lose sight of it. 

In this performance- and productivity-driven age, rest is pictured almost like a luxury. Remember the famous speech of Alec Baldwin in Glengarry Glen Ross? When he barks at Jack Lemmon that coffee is for closers only? I’m worried that today more and more people are trained to think (or otherwise led to believe) that rest, too, is for closers only. That rest is the prize you get after hours of work and hours of overworking. 

The fact is, we need rest to work better. At least I do, and I sometimes have learnt it the hard way. It’s important to factor some rest time in our day. It’s important to overcome the fear of not being productive enough if we decide we need a break. We’re not machines. Rest shouldn’t be considered a hindrance, but a necessary activity that makes us function better and ultimately be more productive.

I’ve been unwell, lately. One morning, after getting up, I experienced a moderate back pain that wouldn’t go away that easily, very probably due to a contracture in my lower back muscles. This happens because I haven’t been exercising and I spend a lot of time sitting at my desk. I’m taking measures to prevent such a thing from happening in the future, and I’m angry with myself for letting things get to this point. Again, rest should be part of the plan from the beginning, not something you’re forced to take into consideration by the physical or mental stress you’ve been accumulating all along.

I have learnt to say “Not today”. There are moments in which I just feel that, no matter how hard I try, I can’t translate a certain passage the way I want, or I can’t write a piece to publish here despite taking a lot of notes and having gathered my thoughts. If the circumstances allow it, rather than force myself to do something I know won’t come out at its best, I just stop and say “Not now”, or even “Not today” if I’m particularly down and low on energies. 

It’s not a cop-out, and certainly I’m not suggesting that you should work only if and when you really, really feel like to. Some people have strict working hours, and have to work and rest according to someone else’s schedule. My advice is especially aimed to professionals and freelancers who have complete freedom to plan and schedule their time. You need sleep. You need to get up and go for a walk. You need to stop obsessing over that thing and find some distractions. No matter how busy you are. Even computers feel more responsive after a reboot.

On Safari 5.1 performance issues

Software

Lately I have noticed an interesting trend, both on Twitter and on some blogs I read on a regular basis: people complaining about Safari 5.1 performance. Many seem to agree that it has noticeably worsened compared with Safari 5.0.x. Some also add that Google Chrome, in their experience, is noticeably faster than Safari.

Tim Bray:

For some years, Safari has been my default browser. I generally prefer its choices in framing and ergonomics and shortcuts over all others. But I’ve had to stop using it.

Via John Gruber, who added:

I’m seeing the same things Bray is with Safari for Mac, particularly the performance problems when you have a lot of windows and tabs open.

Via Marco Arment, who added:

I’m also frustrated by the same performance problems with Safari 5.1 on Lion, although it was similar on Snow Leopard as of my (relatively late) Lion upgrade two weeks ago.

I don’t even have Flash installed, so I can’t blame that: Safari 5.1 is just incredibly slow in general web rendering, scrolling, and other interactions. It’s a huge regression from the performance of Safari 5.0, and feels even slower than Mobile Safari on my iPad 2 at times.

I have to say that — while I too have noticed a general worsening of Safari 5.1’s performance compared with Safari 5.0.x (or even with Safari 4.x on Mac OS X Tiger, for that matter) — I can’t say that my user experience with Safari has become ‘frustrating’. It still feels responsive as regards to scrolling and other interactions. Furthermore, on my system I haven’t noticed this evident performance gap between Chrome and Safari other people are claiming. 

Of course there are some variables at play, and I guess these differences depend on system configuration and browser usage. Since upgrading to Safari 5.1, the only mildly annoying thing I have noticed is the infamous ‘page reloading’ issue where sometimes, when jumping to another tab, the previously loaded webpage doesn’t appear to be cached and is force-reloaded. For this matter I lost a long comment I was posting on a blog: I opened another tab to check an article and a link to corroborate what I was writing, returned to the comment page and Safari told me that it wasn’t responding and that it had to force-reload it.

So yes, annoying, but apart from this I haven’t felt Safari to be remarkably slower than the previous version or than Google Chrome. And I usually have at least 8–9 tabs open. For the sake of comparison, here’s some more information about my system: my main Mac is a 15-inch MacBook Pro (mid-2009, 2.66 GHz Core 2 Duo). I’m still using Snow Leopard (10.6.8, fully updated). I have disabled Flash entirely, except from the built-in plugin in Google Chrome. Also worth noting is that I use Safari without extensions. Another thing worth mentioning is that Safari feels somewhat more stable after disabling the caches (Develop > Disable Caches), which actually sounds paradoxical if you consider the force-reload issue mentioned above. It’s just a feeling though, one of the things you try while troubleshooting. I’m not saying that disabling caches is an effectual remedy. It may depend on something entirely different.

It would be interesting to know about your experience with Safari 5.1 (if it’s your main browser). Give some feedback if you like, and let’s see how your mileage varies.

Doing what you love is not enough

Tech Life

Sometimes on the Web I happen to read success stories of people who go on and on talking about their achievements. By comparing these kinds of stories, one can see that these people, from the business executive to the blogger, all have been able to identify what drives them, focus on it, obsess over it, and that has essentially been the key to their success.

I’m not here to deny that or to prove that wrong. It’s not wrong and those people aren’t lying or embellishing things up — in most cases, their success is quite evident. However, I’m afraid there are a couple of things those who read such success stories often misunderstand. The first thing people tend to believe is that such success stories are the norm, so that it’s enough to follow their recipe to achieve similar results. (Sounds naïve, right? You have no idea how many believe that. Even I believed that some time ago.)

The second thing people tend to believe from those success stories is that it all stems from a 2‑step process:

  1. Work hard, doing what you love, obsessing over what you’re most passionate about.
  2. Success.

I’m afraid that, unless you’re extremely lucky, “Success” is definitely a Step 3, and there’s going to be a Step 2 before, and that Step 2 is probably the worst son of a bitch you’ll meet in your path. In fact, for some people, it may never come. I for one am still at Step 1. I’ve been at Step 1 for a long time, actually.

And Step 1 is important, fundamental: if you want to get somewhere, you have to work hard, there’s no way around it. But other people’s success stories, I think, are distracting and misleading. A part of you is somehow unconsciously tricked into thinking that it’s going to be easy. That guy just broke some eggs in a saucepan and got the perfect omelette, you may think. And when you do the same and you won’t get the perfect omelette, you may feel a little lost. And disappointed. Of course it’s a metaphor, and maybe not even a good one at that. The gist of it is that a recipe isn’t something written in stone that will guarantee a decent result. It’s more like a detailed guide to get from point A to point B but, like a physical map, it won’t tell you anything about the (possibly many) variables you’ll encounter on your path.

My personal Catch-22

Plainly put, and without taking into account many other things that interest me and I enjoy doing, what I love is writing. Writing here, about technology, design, usability and environs; but most of all I love writing poetry and fiction. Over the years I’ve accumulated a lot of material, mostly in Italian but also in English (especially my recent production). A large part of my œuvre is unpublished, but especially during the 1990s I performed a fair amount of readings and my pieces were powerful enough to attract a small, faithful audience. I submitted some writings to the criticism of a few literature professors at the university I attended, and the general consensus was that I was a promising author (the most direct comment I received was You’re on the right track). So, by combining all these elements, plus the few things I have actually published, plus the fact that I’ve been writing ‘seriously’ since 1987, plus the fact that I am my hardest, strictest critic — well, I feel I have earned the right to call myself a Writer.

Life though, being life, has decided that to earn a living I had to do something else. So I am a translator. Translating is something I like to do, but I can’t honestly say I love it as much as writing. My life is divided between these two strong forces: writing and translating. My ultimate goal is to eliminate the translating part (at least for work) and spend my days doing what I truly madly deeply love — writing. So where is the Catch-22? My Catch-22 is this: to be able to truly shine at what I do best (writing), I have to devote “vast, unbroken slabs of time” [1] to it. I cannot do that, at present, because I need that time to do the other thing (translating), which I have to do if I want to earn some money.

Having less time to do what you love sucks like a billion vacuum cleaners. Having less time to do what you love means lots of abandoned projects, ideas that take an unnecessarily long time to properly develop, much fewer updates to this website than I’d like, and so on and so forth. It’s a very frustrating situation and one that can’t be readily solved in practice. I know what you’re thinking: If writing is what you love most, you should drop everything and write and write and do everything in your power to make your stories and your poems known to the public.

I would gladly take a sabbatical, shut out everything else, and give all of my energies and attention and dedication to writing — if only could I afford it. But I haven’t got any savings that would sustain me for an indefinite time interval, and in the translation business (like many other freelance jobs) you just can’t say to a client “I’m leaving for a while, but we can continue our collaboration whenever I return”: they will find someone else and you will have to find other clients and, despite your reputation, it will be hard.

I know what you’re thinking now: If writing is what you love most, what you care most for, you shall have to take that risk. I absolutely agree, provided you will pay my bills and debts while I’m away, creating new amazing stuff.

Living (in) the balance

I’m trying to do both things, despite their mutual interferences. I’m trying to finish a novel and a few short stories to finally self-publish an eBook. I’m trying to publish interesting, non-banal stuff here in my website (and in two languages, in case you didn’t notice), hoping that someday I’ll be able to devote all my energies to writing and tech-writing. What you can do is give me a little help: if you like what you see here, if you like the idea that I could provide more interesting and original content more frequently if I had more time, some little things you could do for me are:

  1. Donate (whatever amount you feel);
  2. Use the Readability tools you see on every article page in my site (that “Read Now | Later | Send to Kindle” widget you see above the article’s title). By clicking on one of those buttons you ensure that a small amount of money comes to me;
  3. Spread the word. Positive feedback and word of mouth can be extremely beneficial. If I see something worth linking, I link to it. If you see something here that’s worth linking, please do the same. Mention it in your blog, tumblelog, what have you; tweet or retweet it, use the social network of your choice. Sharing is rather effortless nowadays.

In the meantime, thank you all very much for listening. I had to get this out of my system.

 


 

  • 1. “Writing novels is hard, and requires vast, unbroken slabs of time. Four quiet hours is a resource that I can put to good use. Two slabs of time, each two hours long, might add up to the same four hours, but are not nearly as productive as an unbroken four. If I know that I am going to be interrupted, I can’t concentrate, and if I suspect that I might be interrupted, I can’t do anything at all. Likewise, several consecutive days with four-hour time-slabs in them give me a stretch of time in which I can write a decent book chapter, but the same number of hours spread out across a few weeks, with interruptions in between them, are nearly useless.” (Neal Stephenson, in Why I am a Bad Correspondent)