My only WWDC 2015 wish: a truly better OS X

Tech Life

In less than an hour the WWDC 2015 will begin. This time I haven’t been reading much about it, and I don’t know anything about related rumours. The only thing I’ve caught on Twitter about the next versions of OS X and iOS is that for both, the focus will probably be more on technical refinements than a superficial list of shiny new features. Oh, and that the San Francisco font will probably become the new system font for OS X 10.11. If these things turn out to be true, well, it’s good news to me.

I’ve nothing to complain about iOS 8, actually. It has been working very well on all of my and my wife’s iOS devices (iPhone 5, iPad 2, iPad 3), and I’ve enjoyed all the new features and improvements over iOS 7. Such improvements, I feel, have made sense, and have noticeably contributed to an overall better iOS experience.

Those who have been following me for a while now will already know what I think about OS X Yosemite. While iOS 8 has truly felt like an improvement over iOS 7 and a further step in the right direction, I can’t say the same about Yosemite. Full disclosure here: at the risk of sounding full of bullshit and unprofessional — no, my stance on OS X Yosemite doesn’t come from direct experience. I still haven’t installed it on my MacBook Pro, and I don’t intend to even if the Mac technically supports it. But I have had enough of it from indirect or ‘quasi-direct’ experience, meaning I’ve used other people’s Macs with Yosemite installed, usually to perform some troubleshooting session. 

So far, even without installing it on my Mac, I can say that Yosemite has largely been an unreliable experience, and has felt unnecessary for my Mac computing needs. Let me reiterate the point: the impression of unreliability and unpredictability is not merely derived from hearsay, or simply based on the (admittedly numerous) complaints people have voiced online. It’s something I’ve witnessed with my own eyes when assisting other users with Yosemite installed on their Mac. Most of these users, I should add, are rather tech-savvy people, not Mac novices at all.

As for considering Yosemite an unnecessary upgrade: last year, I was initially excited by this new version of OS X. Especially when it was confirmed it would run on my aging mid-2009 MacBook Pro. I couldn’t wait to take advantage of what I considered the best innovation in Yosemite: Continuity and Handoff. I was ready to forget about my utter dislike for Neue Helvetica as system font and the new design of the user interface. But when I realised that Continuity wasn’t supported by my MacBook Pro’s hardware, the initial enthusiasm rapidly faded away. Meanwhile, friends and acquaintances who had upgraded started asking for my help — their Macs felt more sluggish, they had all kinds of problems with Wi-Fi, and so on. 

So I began delaying the upgrade on my Mac. I waited for 10.10.1, then 10.10.2, then 10.10.3… But meanwhile I’ve also been asking myself, more and more frequently, what’s the point? Why should I install Yosemite on my Mac? Mavericks works fine. I don’t like Yosemite’s UI. I don’t have a retina display nor have I good eyesight, so Neue Helvetica is a definite step back compared to Lucida Grande. The only aspect of Yosemite that could be truly useful to me — Handoff — is not supported on my Mac (and my iOS devices are too old anyway). Photos for Mac alone is not compelling enough. Why lose time to install, and then surely troubleshoot, OS X Yosemite, when I can stay on Mavericks, keep working in an environment that’s stable and doesn’t give me surprises or show unexpected behaviour, and whose user interface I actually like better?

So here we are. The WWDC 2015 is about to start, and I really want to know what are the plans for OS X 10.11. I do hope Apple’s focus will be on offering a sort of ‘stable version of Yosemite’ kind of update, like Snow Leopard was to Leopard a few years back. I have come to a point in my computing experience where I’m more interested in stability rather than new features for the sake of adding features. How innovation is implemented is more important to me than innovation ‘just because,’ if you know what I mean. Therefore, my only wish for OS X 10.11 is that it doesn’t feel as ‘beta’ as Yosemite still feels after a few minor updates.

The hiatus

Briefly

It’s been over a month since I last updated this place. The other day I tweeted a hint as to why:

Still, since I have received a few concerned messages about my silence, I figured I could give a quick update regarding this hiatus. The short answer is, I’m fine, I’ve just been busy doing other things. The more articulate answer is, There are a few reasons behind my not publishing anything since the end of April.

  1. Vantage Point magazine takes up a fair amount of my time. Working on two issues per month is hard. I knew it when I self-imposed this periodicity at the start, and although I’ve been a bit behind with the schedule, I’m confident my (few) readers will understand that I always try to put quality before anything else and I don’t want to rush an issue just for calendar reasons. Each issue has a theme, and sometimes finding one can be surprisingly difficult. Lately I’ve practically scrapped an entire issue because I was not satisfied with the chosen theme and the articles written about it. I’ve also had to rewrite an episode of Low Fidelity, the sci-fi serialised novel that’s a recurrent feature of the magazine. By the way, if you’re a subscriber and you’re enjoying Vantage Point, please spread the word, help me expand my readership and make this endeavour worthwhile since I’m still operating at a loss and the magazine is still basically at the labour-of-love stage. Thank you.
  2. The (film) photography bug has bitten me once again, and hard. I’ve been shooting more, reading more about photography, spending more time on photography sites (damn you, Japan Camera Hunter), looking for new old gear, even discovering interesting YouTube channels on the subject (gasp!). I also managed to restore both a camera and a lens to a functional state, and that took time as well: 

    Canon A-1

    Canon A‑1 with 50mm f1.4 lens

  3. I’ve been trying out Textshot+, an interesting app by Lionheart Software — the creators of Pushpin, my favourite iOS client for Pinboard.
  4. Speaking of Pushpin, I’ve also been working on updating the Italian localisation (something long overdue, I know).
  5. Perhaps this will sound strange, but another reason I haven’t published anything tech-related here lately is that I haven’t found anything in tech worth being enthusiastic over. New stuff is introduced all the time, and maybe it’s just that I’m having difficulties with keeping up with the pace, or maybe it’s the maddening pace of the debate surrounding whatever’s being introduced that I find more alienating than ever. Since nobody seems interested in slowing the hell down, well, I did. There is less and less time to process information today — the tech world online is perpetuating this breakneck pace, where, say, a product is announced or introduced, and before you can even take a look at it yourself, a dozen sources are already throwing their opinions in your face. Sometimes the noise of all these opinions and speculations flying around is just too overwhelming and one needs to tune out.

The new sharing interface in Unread 1.5

Software

Supertop’s Unread (originally created by Jared Sinclair) is my favourite RSS reader on iOS. It’s thanks to Unread that I went back to actively reading RSS feeds on my iPhone. The interface is that good. (Here’s the brief review I wrote in early 2014 when the app first came out.)

The latest 1.5 update is really packed with bug fixes and assorted improvements. When an application has a great, well-designed, user interface, I like to see underlying improvements that make it more versatile and powerful without drastic changes and major disruptions to what truly works. In this regard, I commend the efforts of Supertop’s developers and I think they’re doing a great job.

But I also like to nitpick when an app I love is involved, and in this case my nitpicking is about the changes in the sharing interface.

A few days ago, when Supertop announced the new 1.5 version of Unread on their blog, they wrote this about the improved Readability View (emphasis mine):

This has been, by far, the most common feature request we’ve received for Unread.

Articles that are truncated in RSS feeds or linked from sites like Daring Fireball are now much easier to read. On the article screen, swipe from right to left to bring in the options menu then tap Readability View to load the full text of the article into Unread’s native interface.

This feature is particularly nice when reading at night since Readability View respects your chosen theme and won’t shock your eyes by opening a bright webpage.

The problem is that with the ‘improved’ sharing interface, they kind of went in the opposite direction. I often read RSS feeds at night, so I stick to dark themes for Unread. ‘Dusk’ and ‘Blue Train’ are my favourites, and ‘Halloween’ is truly an eye-saver late at night. It’s like having f.lux on the iPhone, in a way. Here’s an example of how Unread’s sharing interface worked before, taken from Unread 1.4.2 under iOS 7.1.2 on my iPhone 4. Let’s say I want to share an article via Twitter:

Share UI in Unread 1.4.2 - 1

Fig. 1

Share UI in Unread 1.4.2 - 2

Fig. 2

Share UI in Unread 1.4.2 - 3

Fig. 3

 

Notice how in Fig. 2 the UI of the list of available services perfectly matches the rest of the app’s UI, and also how beautifully integrated the interface for writing the tweet is. It retains the chosen theme’s colour scheme, and offers a dark iOS keyboard.

And here’s the same procedure when I want to share the same article using Unread 1.5 under iOS 8.3 on my iPhone 5:

Share UI in Unread 1.5 - 1

Fig. 4

Share UI in Unread 1.5 - 2

Fig. 5

Share UI in Unread 1.5 - 3

Fig. 6

 

When iOS share sheet comes up (Fig. 5) and I’m reading articles on my iPhone at night using the Halloween theme, all that white, light grey and bright colours are really a punch in my tired eyes, and the UI feels completely alien, not integrated with the app’s UI. I’m not a developer: I guess this change makes sense from a coding standpoint and in the grand scheme of things behind the scenes. Visually, however, it feels like a step back. Same goes for the (iOS default) Twitter sharing interface in Fig. 6., which is pretty ugly compared with Fig. 3. And this time the light iOS keyboard comes up: again, the effect is rather jarring when you’re using dark themes and reading at night.

About the sharing interface, Supertop wrote:

Unread was originally built before iOS 8 was released and Jared went to extraordinary lengths to integrate the app with services like Facebook, Twitter, Instapaper & Pocket. In iOS 8, Apple opened up integration between apps and services using the share sheet and we have fully embraced that in Unread 1.5.

It is now easier than ever to send links, article snippets and images to any other app on your device, whether to save articles for reading later or publish on your social network of choice.

When I started writing the draft of this article, I initially pointed out that, actually, the services listed in the new, native sharing interface are fewer than what was available before (see Fig. 2), and that I was truly missing sharing to App.Net and Pinboard (the service I use most). But in a following blog update, Supertop wrote:

Instapaper and Pinner (and probably others) currently don’t accept images, so when you try to share a post that has images, they don’t appear as share options. Brian Donohue, the developer of Instapaper tweeted that it’ll be fixed in the next release.

In the mean time, here’s a handy work around: Tap and hold on the article title and a share sheet will appear that is targeted solely for sharing URLs and Instapaper and Pinner will appear here.

It works, and I can share to Pinboard now, but I still think the previous interface — albeit probably more difficult to maintain from a technical standpoint and less flexible overall — felt more integrated with the app and more pleasant to use.

The Pause

Tech Life

Around the beginning of the second week of April, when I was scrambling to publish Issue 16 of Vantage Point Magazine, I received a couple of private messages and emails, more or less at the same time, from different people asking how I was doing and whether everything was all right. You haven’t been showing up on Twitter/App.Net much lately and It’s been a while since you updated your blogs was the gist of the messages, their tone (as I interpreted it) sounding like a mixture of concern and friendly reminder to give people content to chew over.

Normally I welcome such feedback. I don’t receive much of it, and for someone who has been writing online for almost 15 years it’s sometimes disheartening. It’s the phenomenon I generally refer to as Talking to an empty room. You try to update your site, not really on a daily basis, but at least on a meaningful one, you try to avoid shallow link-posts or one-sentence commentary, you try to do your homework in the best possible way before opening your mouth online to say something, and more often than not, you end up face to face with the Talking to an empty room phenomenon. Sometimes you don’t care. You shrug it off and tomorrow is another day. Sometimes you’re low, and you just want to tweet What’s the fucking point!? and delete everything in a fit of rage. And sometimes it’s something in between these extremes.

This time around, those feedback ‘nudges’ involuntarily contributed to a snowball effect that was already in motion behind the scenes. I’m a one-man operation. I maintain two websites (this one and System Folder), plus the Minigrooves project website, plus twice each month I have to come up with enough material to publish two issues of Vantage Point Magazine, plus I write fiction (short stories for the aforementioned Minigrooves project, and the ongoing serialised science fiction novel Low Fidelity I publish as recurring feature of Vantage Point Magazine). Then there’s the occasional translation work (yes, I still translate), and when it comes, it’s almost always a high-priority assignment, which means shutting everything else down and concentrating on that, and that only. 

If it sounds like a lot of stuff, it’s because it is. Further, I can’t multitask. I’ve tried in the past, and I soon realised it’s something I want to leave to machines. Everything I do, the things I write about, whether it’s tech-related pieces or other articles, or fiction, all require a minimum of research. Many bloggers insist on the importance of writing, of doing some sort of daily writing exercise to avoid atrophy; there is much insistence on the writing part of the writing process, on the output. But what about the input?, the research, the reading part that hopefully should take place before firing up a word processor and typing away? That is equally important. That, too, is prone to atrophy if neglected. And reading, searching and researching, takes some time. If I’m reading and researching stuff, I can’t write ‘something, anything,’ at the same time.

When those feedback messages came, earlier this month, they made me realise that my absence in certain places (my website, social networks) was felt. I was very busy taking care of something else — my magazine, my novel, and the groundwork for Volume №2 of Minigrooves — and those friendly ‘nudges’ had an unforeseen side effect: they made me overload. Things, for a day, just spiralled out of control. In retrospect, it was a silly moment. Rationally I knew I couldn’t do everything simultaneously, that if I was hard at work on something specific, I couldn’t just start cracking jokes or engaging in conversations on Twitter and App.Net, or throw up a few posts on my blogs, or write a rebuttal of the nth article talking about the Power Mac G4 Cube and the Newton as being the biggest Apple failures, and so on and so forth. Emotionally, however, I felt horribly overwhelmed. I was already spending the better part of my day sitting at the computer, yet for a moment, in a sort of frenzied trance, I wanted to do more, to cover all the bases, etc. 

And then, as soon as I hit Publish and pushed Issue 16 of Vantage Point to my readers, a switch went off, and I paused. I went on holiday without really going nowhere. I spent most of this month in a sort of low-tide state. I don’t mean to say that I was feeling low — quite the contrary, in fact. At times, it felt exhilarating. I was actively refusing to be engaged with ‘the Internet’ and the stupid, inhuman pace this ‘always-on’ lifestyle subtly imposes. This is not another of my pieces openly advocating disconnection, and reminiscing about the good old pre-Web times. The aspect worth emphasising here is control more than disconnection. I’ve spent weeks letting Internet dictate my daily routine. I’m interested in technology, and that means keeping up with new things that get introduced, and often with the debate that necessarily follows. The problem is that keeping up with anything related to technology (and everything technology touches in our lives, which is… pretty much everything) is simply not possible, unless you do that for a living and you spend the whole day doing just that[1].

Some days following the flow online is kind of nice. You feel up to speed on everything. You feel involved. Friends and contacts over Twitter are great, there are jokes, exchanges, banter, sarcasm. You feel in the loop. You feel part of something. You feel relevant. 

You also spend ninety percent of your waking hours staring at screens of various sizes, until you go to bed, your eyes strained and teary. And another day goes by, and it’s pretty much like the day before — skimming news on the iPad in the morning while having coffee, taking notes, checking stuff, checking more stuff, taking more notes because the RTWA syndrome kicks in, then my wife gets home from work and it’s time to prepare and have lunch, then the afternoon is spent in the studio, at the computer, with more ‘keeping up with the world’ activities, reading RSS feeds, browsing, taking notes, writing emails, then it’s dinner time, then more writing and checking stuff on the Web and on Twitter and so on and on and on.

Then you snap out of it and realise two weeks of your life have gone, drowned and washed away by this kind of routine. When you’re a teenager, or in your twenties, you don’t care. You feel invincible, full of energy; maybe you’re on your own, or maybe you’re with someone who’s equally full of energy, and staring at screens of various sizes 16 hours per day is fun and not a big deal. When you’re in your thirties and forties, you start to prioritise, and your time and your energies are the first to be prioritised (at least, they should be). When you realise you let two weeks of your time and energy get sucked away like that, it doesn’t feel okay. Even if it felt nice at first. Drinking spirits and tasting fine beverages such as single malt whisky is nice, ending up horribly drunk and vomiting your guts in an alley or hugging a toilet seat… eh, not so much.

So, what happened earlier this month, when I paused? 

There was an initial phase of pure internal chaos. Radio silence. Ignoring emails, messages, social networks. Breaking routines. I also spent some time feeling unwell, and that was, as strange as it may sound, a happy coincidence in my unplanned plan of routine disruption. ‘The Pause’ hasn’t just been about keeping Internet at arm’s length and disrupting routines. It has also been an occasion to stop and think, refocus, ask myself “What exactly am I doing” and “Where am I going with this” and “Do I want to keep doing this for how long exactly”… It has been a matter of regaining control, in a way. Over what I do every day in general, but also over the specific processes behind what I do — writing, in all its forms and purposes.

I have never been a fan of routines, and I’ve never been a workaholic. Well, I had to be one if I wanted to survive during a specific period of my life, but what I mean is that, typically, I’m not one of those people who bask in their overworking. Not even with things you like doing? — you ask. No, not even with those. Even when I’m particularly inspired and driven, I know that if I keep at it for too long, the final creative product will be weak tea. A weaker tea than writing the same amount of material by taking more time and writing in more deliberate, inspired bursts when I feel relaxed and not under excessive pressure to produce something at all costs. That doesn’t mean I don’t challenge myself with self-imposed deadlines (like the two issues per month of Vantage Point Magazine or the one/two short stories per week when Cycle 1 and Cycle 2 of Minigrooves were ‘airing’ online). I simply mean that overworking when writing fiction rarely produces good results — at least, that’s what happens with me. 

Showing up every day’ doesn’t work with me. It’s not laziness. It’s not lack of organisation. I thought it was, and that was the Internet’s fault. Many people’s attention span is progressively shortening. Too much time spent staring at screens of various sizes, in the flow of this constant engagement of the online sphere. Sometimes I picture that flow, it’s like a fluid that quickly spreads and reaches everywhere in one’s personal sphere. So you lose focus, you lose attention and the ability to work on what you do with the needed perseverance and resolution. And maybe a ‘creative routine’ like Shawn Blanc’s is the perfect recipe for you to get back on track. Something like that doesn’t work for me. I know because I tried something very similar during the awful creative block I suffered for about four years around 2006–2010.

During the Pause I’ve been enjoying my time without plans and routines, without news to keep up with, without ‘fear of missing out’; I’ve been researching stuff I’m interested in without feeling the need to take notes about it or share it or act on it in some way. I’ve rested my eyes, and spent days without writing a single word. Contrary to what some writers do or suggest, I’m not afraid I’ll lose my voice, my style and my creative abilities if I don’t write something every day. There are days worth spending erratically absorbing what surrounds you, or engaging in disorganised hunts for information on subjects you love, or just losing yourself in one of your interests without feeling the urge to then write about it.

Put habits to good use to achieve productivity, if you like, if that works for you, but don’t fall prey to this crazy workaholism-driven mentality that’s spreading like wildfire lately. Don’t let habits and routines overload you and define you. 

 


  • 1. And judging by the quality of certain articles, even those who do that for a living don’t even have the time to properly do their homework.

 

The new MacBook in person — First impressions

Tech Life

It’s svelte. It’s thin. It’s lightweight. It exudes an aura of desirability I hadn’t felt in years, probably since the first-generation MacBook Air. I managed to try it for about 15 minutes, so these are truly first, initial impressions and perhaps I’ll re-evaluate them down the road when I’ll have more time to spend with the MacBook.

In a nutshell, for me the new retina MacBook is a strange machine. When I look at it, I know I’m seeing a very portable, extremely light and compact laptop computer, but at the same time it also feels like seeing a 12-inch iPad running OS X, with a thin accessory keyboard attached to it. Combine that with the visual iOS-feel of OS X Yosemite, and you’ll forgive me if, during the 15 minutes I spent with the MacBook, I tried to touch the screen a few times to interact with the user interface.

The display is, obviously, quite beautiful. Crisp, rich colours, and an impressive viewing angle. I’m not particularly fond of a number of UI decisions featured in OS X Yosemite, but I must say that Yosemite really shines on a retina display, and has evidently been designed with retina displays in mind. On such a display, I really don’t mind reading Helvetica Neue at 10pt.

Everything other reviewers have already said about the new trackpad is true. It’s pure tactile illusion — your eye sees that nothing is moving when you click, but your finger feels differently. It’s weird, but cool. Of course, after the initial sensory confusion, you start using the Mac normally, pointing and clicking without really looking at the trackpad, and everything feels just fine.

What is weird, and not as cool — at least for me — is the keyboard. Keys are slightly bigger and more tightly spaced than on the other MacBook Pros and Airs and external Apple keyboards. It took a little readjustment of the way I usually position my hands over the keyboard when typing, because at first my fingers didn’t fully land on the centre of the keys. That led to typos and typing ‘misses’ I never made on a computer keyboard, though I surely made while typing quickly and for a long time on the iPad’s virtual keyboard in landscape orientation. But the really off-putting detail has been, for me, the short key travel. 

I type a lot every day, so keyboard performance in a computer is one of the most important features for me. So, for the better part of the time I spent with the new MacBook, I tried to type as much as I could. Of all the MacBook reviews I’ve read these days, this bit of Christina Warren’s is the one that matches my impression on the new keyboard more closely:

One consequence of the keys being so close to the frame is that the low amount of travel did make the typing process a bit more… painful. I don’t suffer from carpal tunnel, but I did find that extended periods typing on the new MacBook keyboard tired my wrists a bit more than a traditional keyboard. Take breaks if you’re going to be writing on this thing all the time — at least until you “break it in.”

Not only that, but after just 15 minutes of typing, I started feeling some discomfort in my fingertips as well. Christina writes “I was worried that the lack of travel would make typing difficult, that it would be too much like typing on glass — but it’s not.” It is for me, though. After a bit, I felt like I was tapping my fingers on the desk, more than typing on a keyboard. It’s a pity, because I think that the new butterfly mechanism is indeed better and more robust, but for me this innovative detail’s advantage is severely attenuated by the very short key travel.

The last truly comfortable keyboard on an Apple laptop is, in my experience, the one featured in the aluminium PowerBook line and the pre-unibody MacBook Pros. The key travel feels right and when you hit a key, there’s a soft, cushioned return that really makes typing for hours a very pleasant and comfortable affair. My main machine from 2004 to mid-2009 has been a 12-inch PowerBook G4, and I still use it as a second machine, especially when I’m out and about and I know that I’m going to write a lot, because my fingers and hands never get tired on its keyboard. (It’s either that, or the 17-inch PowerBook G4, when I need a little more processing power and a bigger screen, of course.)

PowerBook 12 top view
MacBook retina 12 top view s

 

As you can see in the photo above, another detail that makes the PowerBook’s keys more comfortable is that they’re not flat, but slightly concave — typing on them is more pleasant, but for me also more precise, and I never have to stop and look at the keyboard to find the right key, so to speak.

Finally, another new design choice that I really found off-putting in the new MacBook’s keyboard is the shape of the new arrow keys:

 

MacBook retina arrow keys

The enlarged left and right arrow keys really screwed up my muscle memory while using the MacBook. I constantly thought I was hitting the Command or the Option key, and I found myself looking at the keyboard more often than I liked. There are some who don’t love the small size of the arrow keys in the usual ‘Inverted T’ design, at least on laptops, but the space above the left and right arrow keys really helps to ‘find’ them without looking, and also helps when you’re quickly moving around a software program’s interface using the arrow keys (positioning an object in a graphics application, moving your character in a game, etc.). I found their new design in the retina MacBook’s keyboard to be too ‘crowded’ and my fingers didn’t move as easily when tapping on them.

My experience with the new retina MacBook, albeit brief, has been revealing: this new laptop, in a way, drives me crazy — on the one hand, when I see it I can’t help thinking I want this badly, this will be my next Mac, because of its lightness and portability, and because my eyes truly need a retina display in my next Mac; on the other hand, the keyboard is really the deal-breaker here. It’s maddening. What I kept thinking was This should be the perfect computer for a writer and at the same time I was thinking I just can’t write on this MacBook all day. Before I said that the initial impression of the MacBook as a whole is that it kind of feels like an iPad with an attached accessory keyboard; and I can’t help thinking that it’s designed to be used exactly like that, in a tablet-with-a-keyboard way. Therefore the keyboard is going to be more than fine for those who don’t really type that much (Web browsing, email, short documents, etc.) — or maybe for those who may eventually type a lot, but only on the MacBook, and after some time spent acclimatising to the new keyboard.