WWDC 2014 keynote: Mac OS X

Software

It was amazing

For me, that was easily the second best Apple keynote after the introduction of the iPhone in January 2007. With so many new things introduced, I needed a few days to process everything. And I decided that it would be worthwhile to rewatch the keynote and take extensive notes in the meantime, so that I could present some sort of ‘critical recap’ interspersed with my observations. Considering the length of this, I thought it would be better to split it in two parts — one about Mac OS X Yosemite, the other about iOS 8.

Introduction

Tim Cook is getting a better speaker event after event, keynote after keynote. He looked more confident, more spontaneous and more relaxed than in previous appearances. He looked excited, and not just reciting his speech. Then Craig Federighi — the ebullient senior vice president of Software Engineering — stole the show.

Name is Yosemite. OS X Yosemite.

I hope they’ll get to OS X Weed further down the line, though. That version could have a choice of Dalmatian and Flower Power desktop themes. (I guess only long-time Mac users will get the joke.)

OS X’s new interface

As easily predicted, Yosemite sports a flattened UI. Yosemite is to Mavericks what iOS 7 has been to iOS 6. The funny thing is, I loved iOS 7’s interface from the very first moment Apple showed it, but a lot of people didn’t, and had to get used to it over time. With Yosemite, it seems the reaction is the opposite from what I’ve been reading so far. A lot of people are loving it already, and I guess I’ll have to get used to it, because for the moment it raises a few concerns. There are some things I do like, while for other visual choices the impression I have is that Apple has put stylishness over usability (or at least Apple’s idea of elegance over usability). The impression is that, at this juncture, for Apple the more important thing is that OS X looked visually more like iOS. And that has come with some tradeoffs.

My main concern is the choice of leaving Lucida Grande behind as system font, and opting for a custom Helvetica Neue variant that has been tweaked to be more suitable (and readable) for the task. I’ve already voiced my concerns about this matter here and here and I won’t bore you further. I’m not using a beta version of Yosemite, but according to those who are, it seems that the new font is better in person than on screenshots. I guess I’ll have more to say when using OS X on a daily basis, in a few months.

Another detail I’m not particularly sold on is the insistence on translucency in the new UI — especially in Finder windows. I have the desktop wallpaper set to change every 30 minutes, and some of my favourite wallpapers are rather busy images. I also typically have at least 7–8 Finder windows open at all times (I’m not a big fan of Finder tabs). I really am curious to see how these two things combined with Yosemite’s translucency effects are going to impact the overall clarity of the interface for me. During Federighi’s demos I had the feeling (or maybe he even said it) that Apple sees this translucency as a way to ‘give depth’ to the interface. I think that works better on iOS, though. On a computer’s interface, I think it’s important that the user focuses on what’s in the foreground, instead of continuously getting hints of what is in the background. Federighi, about the translucency effects: “All in all they come together for a gorgeous and more usable version of OS X.” We’ll see, won’t we?

I love the new Dock, though. They finally got rid of the 3D shelf look for a glassy 2D look that I believe really works great on OS X. I also like most of the new icons. I’ll have to get used to the happier, more cartoonish Finder, and I find peculiar that — while the overall trend is towards abstraction — Mail’s icon actually feels even more realistic than on Mavericks and earlier OS X versions. I also love the new Dark Mode for the interface, and I have the feeling it’ll be my default mode.

Notification Centre: It gets a new Today view, like on iOS, and the contents of this Today view can be extended by using widgets from apps downloaded from the App Store. I think this is a brilliant way to make widgets become something actually useful, and makes more sense than having a Dashboard space where widgets are gathered all there a bit isolated. (Yes, in Mavericks you can have Dashboard overlay the screen, but overlaying the whole screen breaks the workflow more starkly than invoking this new Notification Centre.)

Spotlight: The new interface looks a bit like Alfred: now the search field and results window appear more prominently in the centre of the screen, instead of being confined in the sort of interactive menu we’ve seen from Tiger to Mavericks. Search has also been extended, including external results from Bing, Wikipedia, Maps, etc. As it says on Apple’s site, Spotlight now “gives you richer, more interactive previews of your results. So you can read a document, send an email, or make a phone call by clicking a result.” The new Spotlight interface is a modernised version of the good old Show All panel that was first implemented under Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger to then disappear in Leopard, much to my chagrin.

Spotlight Tiger

Spotlight interface on Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger

 

Spotlight Yosemite

Spotlight interface on OS X Yosemite

Of course this new Spotlight is an improvement, especially for people like me who don’t rely on any other third-party app. I hope the new interface behaves like the current Help Viewer — i.e. it remains always on top no matter how many Finder windows and application windows are littering the screen. I also hope it’s Desktop-agnostic, meaning that if I trigger Spotlight on Desktop 4 and then jump to Desktop 1, I should be able to find the Spotlight panel there as well, without having to hunt for it among Desktops and open windows via Mission Control.

Like others said, these more powerful search options in Spotlight, coupled with its instant availability, are an interesting jab at Google — it’s certainly easier to perform quick searches without even opening a browser tab or window, especially if you can readily act on search results (e.g. maps results or movie information).

iCloud Drive: With iCloud Drive, Documents-in-the-Cloud folders are easily accessible in the Finder. You can get contents that are not stored on your Mac, namely documents created on your iOS devices; and you can organise these documents however you want, with folders and tags, and keep them synced across Macs, access them from iOS devices, and even from Windows devices. I really like the direction Apple is (finally) taking iCloud. For how I work with files, this new Dropbox-like approach is certainly a step forward and will make me use iCloud more.

Mail Drop: Mail Drop is an ingenious way to send large email attachments (up to 5 GB). Apple best explains how it works: When you’re signed in to iCloud, Mail Drop lets you send large files like videos, presentations, even a folder of images without having to worry about your service provider’s limitations. With Mail Drop, when you send a large attachment, it’s automatically uploaded to iCloud. If your recipients use Mail, they’ll receive the attachment just as they do today. If they use another app or webmail, they’ll receive a link to download it. These past years my ‘attachment policy’ has always been to upload any file bigger than 3 MB on my server or on Dropbox, then send my recipient a link to the file. I like how Mail Drop makes this process automatic and makes you save time when you have to send lots of emails with attachments.

Markup: With Markup you can annotate photos directly within Mail, and you can also handle PDF documents (e.g. filling forms and signing PDFs on the spot). Two observations here: 1. Even with this simple feature we can see how Apple is really focusing on the user’s workflow: instead of doing the annotation work separately on a third-party app and then sending the annotated document, now the process is made quicker and more straightforward because it can be done all from inside Mail; 2. I like how you can mark up an image by using the Mac’s trackpad as a touch interface and this, in turn, makes me wonder: how long before a similar feature appears on iOS? I think it’d be great to have, especially on the iPad.

Safari: As expected, Safari gets the full iOS treatment in Yosemite. From a GUI standpoint, some details don’t convince me much. I’m not sure I like the reduced width of the unified address bar. In the screenshots it reminds me of iTunes’ LCD panel a bit (which is not a compliment). Also, I’m not really sold on Safari’s translucent chrome. It may have some sense on the smaller screen of an iPad, but on a Mac I don’t know if I want to see webpage contents scrolling behind the address bar. I also share Min Ming Lo’s concerns when he writes in his Mac OS X Yosemite Under the Magnifying Glass:

A couple of things in the new Safari do not sit well with me. The toolbar UI elements do not fit nicely into a grid. The traffic light buttons are not perfectly middle aligned but sit somewhere between middle and top aligned. The new tab button is also quite annoying because its placement and size does not fall into a proper grid.

Another important change in the new Safari is that you only see the top level domain of the site you’re on. This change does not affect most people but I personally would like to see the full URL at all times.

Nitpicking apart, Safari brings new features I quite like: smart suggestions; the fact that RSS in the address bar is back (sort of: now you can Subscribe in Shared Links); and the new Tab view is really well done (by the way, the first Web browsers to implement such feature — granted, not this elegantly — were Shiira and Camino a few years back). I remain neutral on the new progress bar, which is now a thin line appearing at the bottom edge of the address bar when a website is loading: on the one hand I find it quite coherent with the general UI; on the other, I still think it should be a little more visible than that.

Continuity

This is the moment in the keynote where things start getting really interesting. First, AirDrop now works between iOS and OS X. I really look forward to using it in a few months, when I’ll hopefully upgrade to an iOS 8‑capable iPhone. So far, I haven’t even been able to use AirDrop at all, because it’s not supported on the iPhone 4, and AirDrop on my Mac is useless since I don’t have any other Macs with Mavericks apart from my main MacBook Pro. When I’m able to exchange files via AirDrop between iOS and OS X, I’ll finally get rid of a number of iOS apps I’ve purchased over the years that let me accomplish the same task. (I won’t get rid of all of them, though, since I’ll still need apps like Scotty and Air Sharing to send photos to and exchange documents with my PowerPC Macs wirelessly.)

Then, Handoff: when Federighi introduced this, I really cried Brilliant! out loud. With Handoff, you can pick up on the iPhone or iPad what you were doing on the Mac, and vice-versa. And with Instant Hotspot, the Mac can connect automatically to the iPhone’s personal hotspot when you’re out and about and there isn’t a public Wi-Fi access point available. I like that, when you’re connected to the iPhone, you can see the iPhone’s signal strength and battery indicator right in the Mac’s Wi-Fi menu. Back to Handoff, I really like how the feature is implemented visually. In the demo, when Federighi is composing an email on his iPhone, there is a new ’tile’ appearing on the far left of the Mac’s Dock, a sort of addition with Mail’s icon and an iPhone badge over it. When Federighi switches to the Mac to finish the message, he clicks on that icon and enters Mail, which displays the email at the exact point he left it on the iPhone. When he is on the Mac browsing in Safari, the iPad nearby is aware of the activity, and a little Safari icon appears on the bottom left of the iPad’s lockscreen. To continue browsing on the iPad, Federighi just performs a swipe up, and enters Safari.

Text messages: Currently, when you receive messages from people who are using non-Apple devices (Federighi calls them the “Green bubble friends”), you can see those messages only on your iPhone. Until now. Thanks to OS X Yosemite and iOS 8’s integration, you’ll be able to receive those messages on your Mac, too. Same goes for phone calls: when you receive a phone call, explains Federighi, your Mac gives you the caller ID, and you can even answer using the Mac. And you’ll be able to make a phone call from the Mac as well (e.g. you’re browsing the Web for a restaurant, and when you find it, you can click on their phone number in the search results, and a contextual “Call [phone number]” menu will appear.

Conclusion

Features like these are what makes me love Apple the most. Again, there isn’t anything exactly new under the sun. The first thing that came to mind while watching Handoff in action was webOS’s Touch to Share, but of course what Apple has done is much more advanced and seamless. What’s more, Apple is going in what I believe is the best direction for OS X + iOS. This kind of integration, this focus on ‘continuity’ and workflow means really putting an ecosystem of devices at the user’s service. Some have said that the new centre of today’s digital lifestyle hub is going to be the iPhone. After this WWDC 2014 keynote I’d like to think that the centre is the users themselves, surrounded by (Apple) devices working as assistants and as a team. This makes much more sense than, say, merging OS X and iOS in one single hybrid OS, something that wouldn’t work because operating systems work best when they’re device-specific.

Note also how a lot of this is made possible by finally putting iCloud to good (and full) use. Since its inception, I couldn’t help but think of how crippled iCloud felt, at least from the perspective of someone like me who heavily relies on services like Dropbox, Box, and CloudApp and Simplenote. And not only that: so far iCloud has felt ‘unpredictable’ and ‘obscure,’ to the point that I rarely used it to sync files, and I haven’t even activated iCloud Photo Sharing. So far, I’ve always considered iCloud more like a MobileMe 2.0, if you know what I mean. But when Federighi started talking about iCloud Drive, I knew things were finally looking up.

And this is only the beginning of a new course. I think I can see a common denominator that indicates, more than anything, the nature of Tim Cook’s leadership and style as CEO of Apple: collaboration and cooperation. It started with the company’s internal reorganisation at the executive level. Remember the reasons given for Scott Forstall’s ousting:

So the changes — it’s not a matter of going from no collaboration to collaboration. We have an enormous level of collaboration in Apple, but it’s a matter of taking it to another level. You look at what we are great at. There are many things. But the one thing we do, which I think no one else does, is integrate hardware, software, and services in such a way that most consumers begin to not differentiate anymore. They just care that the experience is fantastic.

(Source: Bloomberg Businessweek)

A lot of developers have already noted how all the new features and tools introduced at the WWDC clearly indicate more openness on Apple’s part, and Apple’s intention to create a more collaborative environment with developers. I think this collaborative attitude ultimately reaches the final users through the synergy of OS X Yosemite and iOS 8. I agree with Eric Jackson, Apple Isn’t A Hardware Or Software Company — It’s An Ecosystem Company, and I think that before long, Apple will be able to provide users with more than a simple ‘digital hub.’ After all I’ve seen introduced at this keynote, the level of user experience Apple is building may become what I like to call a ‘personal infrastructure’ — where applications, services, devices all work (and ‘just work’) in tight integration all the time. Sure, it’s the ultimate lock-in, but if it works great, respects my privacy, and makes me work better, why not?

Preliminary notes on some of OS X Yosemite’s UI elements

Software

Thanks to this post by The Typist, I’ve enjoyed Min Ming Lo’s first look at some details of OS X Yosemite’s redesigned user interface. Take a look at his Mac OS X Yosemite Under the Magnifying Glass, with various annotated screenshots and thoughtful commentary. This article has been really useful to me because it shows parts of Yosemite’s interface I hadn’t seen yet. I generally agree with Min Ming Lo’s observations, but I wanted to add some personal notes to a few specific details I’ve noticed, so I borrowed 5 images and added my remarks right there. (My notes are written in a bolder font weight that should make them distinguishable from Min Ming Lo’s contributions.)

 

Lucida Grande vs Helvetica

Okay, bear with me here, but I have to insist: Helvetica Neue, however tweaked, is still a poor choice as system font compared to Lucida Grande. You may like it more for personal reasons, but look at the image and tell me, honestly, which font is more legible at 12 pt.

 

Dock

The lighter tooltip may look more elegant, but I wonder what happens when you have an application window or a Finder window with a white or very light background right above the Dock. Currently, the darker tooltip along with the embossed Lucida Grande makes for a very noticeable label in any situation (which is the main purpose of these tooltips). That thin font and that light coloured tooltip? I don’t know.

Translucent notification badges: again, cool-looking for sure, but a bit fainter than on Mavericks. This is, admittedly, a minor peeve.

Simple dot for indicator light: a real step back, in my opinion. Compared to Mavericks, these dots are barely visible. People who keep a lot of application icons in their Dock, like me, need to have better indicators for active apps.

 

Menubar icons

(Click to enlarge)

The song remains the same: these UI elements all look more stylish than their Mavericks’ counterparts, but from a usability standpoint they should be clearer. This look may work on iOS because you keep your devices closer to your eyes and can appreciate the finer details. When you’re working with a non-Retina monitor that is roughly 50 cm away from you, I’m not so sure.

 

Controls

Also, consider that ‘Done’ button: sure, on Yosemite it looks ‘more highlighted’ than on Mavericks, therefore it should be more noticeable. On the other hand, the use of white Helvetica for the button text makes the word(s) less legible than Lucida Grande in black on Mavericks.

 

Sidebar

While I don’t particularly mind the colour scheme for the Finder window sidebar in OS X Yosemite, I still find the current situation under Mavericks to be better overall. Better typography, better contrast, better legibility.

That’s not Helvetica

Briefly

Osx design font

(Update, June 5: make sure you read this carefully, especially the Addendum.)

I’m still digesting the incredible amount of new things Apple introduced during yesterday’s WWDC 2014 keynote. I like a lot of what I saw, mind you, but I was disappointed by Apple’s decision to use Helvetica Neue as system font in OS X Yosemite. Despite Apple’s claims that now OS X is going to sport a ‘more elegant’ typeface system-wide, I maintain that Helvetica Neue is a poor choice, because, above all, it doesn’t have a great legibility at smaller sizes. (If you want a more informed opinion, here’s a brief post by Erik Spiekermann from two years ago.) 

However something caught my eye while perusing the pictures of OS X Yosemite on Apple’s site. Go to the Design page and scroll down to the section titled Enjoy the view in all your favourite apps. You can flip through various screenshots featuring different system apps. Among these images, there’s this one of the Finder:

Yosemite Finder

I took a closer look at the menubar:

Osx design view finder nh

And I noticed that, while the ‘Finder’ menu is definitely Helvetica, the other menu items (File, Edit, View, Go, Window, Help) are not set in Helvetica. It looks more like a refined version of Lucida Grande. Compare the image above with the other Finder screenshot at the beginning, and you’ll see it’s not the same font (just look at the G in ‘Go’):

Osx design view finder comparison

Now, I don’t want to read too much into this: the Finder screenshot with the different font is the only instance it appears on Apple’s site. It may simply be an image that was prepared before or taken at an earlier development stage of OS X. It may very well be just a little oversight. Still, a part of me hopes that this is the Apple Sans typeface the company is designing in-house for future use. To me it looks way better than Helvetica.

Addendum

Judging by other people’s suggestions and reactions to this post, there has been a bit of a misunderstanding here. I’m not saying that the system font in OS X Yosemite isn’t Helvetica. It’s indeed a custom Helvetica variant made by Apple to make it more readable (I’ve been told over on App.net that Yosemite also dynamically tweaks kerning and spacing).

What I’m saying that’s not Helvetica is the font I’ve spotted in one of the OS X Yosemite screenshots Apple has featured on the OS X Yosemite preview Design page. (See again above.) 

In other words:

Osx design view finder comparison ann

Both those Finder menubars come from OS X Yosemite screenshots on Apple’s site, but show two different fonts. I’m curious about the one that doesn’t look like the ‘custom Helvetica’ that appears in all the other screenshots. That font which is not Helvetica. I hope this clear things up a bit more as to what I mean.

Helvetica Neue as system font is a bad idea

Software

Nick Heer, in the Mac OS X 10.10 section of his Spitballing WWDC 2014:

But, if the rumours are to be believed, OS X is about to receive a major overhaul. According to Mark Gurman of 9to5Mac, OS X 10.10 will be the star of the conference, with changes such as…

… similar toggle designs to iOS 7, sharper window corners, more defined icons across the system, and more white space than the current version.

Meanwhile, Craig Hockenberry is convinced that the system UI font will be changed to Helvetica Neue from the current Lucida Grande. In fact, the Iconfactory is, in general, trying to get ahead of the curve on 10.10.

I’ve been hearing about the change from Lucida Grande to Helvetica Neue for a while now, and my initial reaction hasn’t changed — I believe Helvetica Neue to be a terrible choice for a system font. On iOS it’s tolerable because you keep your device closer to your eyes than a Mac when you interact with it. On a Mac, I honestly fear Helvetica Neue is going to be a bit of a legibility nightmare.

Let me get a few things out of my system (no pun intended):

  • There is absolutely nothing wrong with Lucida Grande. It is a solid font, very good for display, with great legibility at the various different sizes needed for all UI places and elements.
  • Moving away from Lucida Grande only because ‘it feels old’ is a silly excuse. Especially when the supposed replacement is not an improvement, at all.
  • Choosing Helvetica Neue because it’s the system font on iOS and visually amalgamating Apple’s operating systems is nice, is another silly thing. Why not use VAG Rounded then, since it’s the font in use on Apple’s keyboards? Or why not use Myriad Pro, since it’s Apple’s corporate font? Because the best way to implement a font is considering the context. The user interface of a smartphone or a tablet is different from the user interface of a desktop or laptop computer. This should be Human Interface Guidelines 101.

 

My humble proposal

If I were tasked with coming up with an alternative to Lucida Grande to be used in Mac OS X, my font of choice would be Process Type Foundry’s Seravek:

seravek-specimen.png

 

I find Seravek to be an incredibly versatile font for the screen, and quite legible even at 8–9 pt. It’s my preferred reading font on iBooks, and the only font I feel comfortable keeping at small sizes despite my not-great eyesight:

seravek in iBooks.png

 

To further illustrate my point, I’ve taken three samples of UI elements in OS X Mavericks, and done a quick retouching job in Acorn to show how they would look when Helvetica Neue is used instead of Lucida Grande. I’ve tried to maintain the same font size and spacing. I think there’s no need to use abstruse typographic jargon to explain why Helvetica Neue doesn’t work very well as system font:

 

menubar.png

 

I chose to capture Reeder 2 for Mac’s menubar because it has more items than the Finder’s and features longer words like ‘Accounts’ and ‘Subscriptions’. 1) is the current system font Lucida Grande, 2) is Helvetica Neue, and 3) is Seravek. I still like Lucida Grande best, and you can see the similarities between Seravek and Lucida Grande (although I very much prefer Seravek’s lowercase L). You can also see what’s wrong with Helvetica Neue: there are clusters of letters that end up looking too compressed, for starters. Look at ile in ‘File’, it in ‘Edit’, ie in ‘View’. The lowercase E, having a perfectly round form, looks like the letter theta of the Greek alphabet (ϴ).

But the font size in application menus is one of the biggest across the system. Let’s look at a portion of the Finder’s sidebar:

Sidebar

Look at how better spaced both Lucida Grande and Seravek are at this size. In Lucida Grande and Seravek, thin letters like ‘l’ and ‘i’ are given more room to breathe, and that alone allows for an overall better legibility. Helvetica Neue has too regular shapes and too tight spaces between letters, creating a compressed look that feels even more compressed and more difficult to read as font sizes get smaller.

 

mail-prefs.png

 

Here I’ve captured a portion of the Account panel in Mail.app Preferences, and I’ve added the same labels in Helvetica Neue near the originals in Lucida Grande. Here the system font gets even smaller than in the previous example, reaching 10–11 pt. Maybe those of you with a better eyesight than mine or with Macs equipped with a Retina display won’t mind Helvetica Neue at this size. To me, it’s borderline unbearable. I mean, I can read what it says, but I feel an increased strain that is simply absent when reading Lucida Grande. Look how terribly compressed — and visually awful — that (iCloud) in parentheses is. Same for Outgoing Mail or the tifi in ‘Certificate’.

I could go on and on, but you get the idea.

I know this UI exercise may not prove much, because we’ll have to see how the whole OS X’s user interface changes. Perhaps there are going to be a lot of other visual changes that make Helvetica Neue look better. I know that eventually there are going to be more Mac models with Retina displays, therefore making the system font look even crisper. Still, I maintain that even under those new conditions, there are so many other fonts that could be better choices for a system font rather than Helvetica Neue.

System fonts are one of the key elements in an operating system’s interface. We look at them all the time. In my opinion, such fonts have to be, above all, legible and utilitarian rather than stylish or satisfying other criteria that have little to do with usability. As I said, possible reasons like ‘bringing together the look of OS X and iOS’ or ‘Lucida Grande feels old’ or ‘Don’t worry, Helvetica Neue is going to look great on Retina displays’ are simply not enough to justify such a key change in the Mac’s operating system.

Anyway, let’s see what happens on Monday at the WWDC. I just hope my fears will turn out to be unfounded.

Update, June 3 — Well, unfortunately Apple has decided to follow the Helvetica route. At least I’m not alone in thinking that’s not a great choice: read Tobias Frere-Jones’s contribution, Why Apple’s New Font Won’t Work On Your Desktop.

Vantage Point magazine

Et Cetera

VP3 logo vertical

I’m finally, officially launching my new project, Vantage Point magazine, a compact digital publication available on Apple’s Newsstand platform and produced by the great folks at Type Engine.

Why this magazine

As you’ll read in the introduction on Issue 0 of Vantage Point (the free demo issue you get when you download the app), I wanted to create a sort of Supplement for this website. A publication that could offer new materials related to the subjects I usually talk about here on Morrick.me, and also be an extension of Morrick.me by providing articles about other topics I’m interested in but rarely mention here. I want this website to stay focussed on a few selected categories and subjects, and things like book reviews, music reviews, non-tech opinion pieces, articles about movies or television series, etc., would be a bit out of place on Morrick.me. But not on a dedicated, compact digital Supplement like Vantage Point.

At the same time, I’d love to offer some degree of unpredictability, so that readers might wonder: what’s Rick going to talk about on this issue? I think it’s a good way to keep things interesting. I’m naturally curious, and Vantage Point is aimed at an audience of curious people.

Periodicity, structure, pricing

A new issue of Vantage Point will be available approximately every two weeks, and will include 4–5 articles. Two recurring elements in every issue will be:

  1. An introductory Aperitif, something to stimulate the reader’s appetite. It might be a series of images, a thought, a quote, some brief observations or excerpts found on the Web or in my archives.
  2. An episode of Low Fidelity, a novel I’m going to publish in serialised form (more information is available at the Crosslines//Low Fidelity website and I’ve talked about the project in more detail in this article). It is, I believe, the perfect chance to finally formalise a project I started in 1995 and subsequently left in a bit of a semi-abandoned state.

Since it’s available on Apple’s Newsstand platform, you’ll be able to read Vantage Point on any iOS device, both in portrait and landscape orientation. Together with the Type Engine staff, I did my best to offer a decent experience even on iPhones with a 3.5″ screen in portrait orientation, though text will certainly look better in landscape mode.

Subscriptions will cost $2.99 / €2.69 a month, which means each issue is going to cost you about $1.50 / €1.35, which seems a fair enough price to me.

Type Engine

This magazine wouldn’t exist without the tools and the assistance of Type Engine. Check their site to have an idea of the great service these people provide. I want to thank, in particular, Type Engine founders Jamie Smyth and Daniel Genser who have been extremely encouraging from the start and have helped me a lot in every way; Ben Moodie, who took care of the magazine’s template; David Tyner, Kelly Shaw and Debbie Lopes, who were always there to provide assistance at every step of the process. I also wanted to thank Alicia Kan for being a great motivator, especially in the early days of the project. And another thing worth mentioning: App.net played an important role in all this — without App.net, everything that led to the creation of Vantage Point wouldn’t have happened.

Final note

I really hope you’ll like Vantage Point and that you’ll want to support my writing by becoming subscribers and helping me spread the word. Thoughtful feedback is very welcome. You can reach me on Twitter and App.net as usual (I’m @morrick on both networks) or you can write an email at vp(@)morrick.me. I have also created an official Tumblr account for Vantage Point that I’ll use to list the contents of every issue and for all communications strictly related to the magazine itself.

As always, thank you for reading.

 


 

Update, 29 May 2014 — Users are reporting a few small problems with the app. I did my best to spot bugs and problems before launching the magazine but still something has managed to escape my (and Type Engine’s) attention. I’m adding all reported problems to this post on the Vantage Point official Tumblr account. I want to thank all the people who contacted me so far for their positive feedback and for making me aware of the issues. Hopefully all current problems will be fixed with the next update. Thank you all for your patience and understanding.

 


 

Update, November 2016 — As of end of November 2016, Vantage Point magazine has ceased publications. Thanks to everyone who subscribed and supported this project during the two years of its run!