What I use: RSS feed readers

Software

Not a long time ago there was an active debate on the Web — or at least among the technorati — after someone declared that ‘RSS was dead’. Well, I don’t know about that: if you take a look at my setup, you’ll think it’s very much alive. And for me it is. Sure, some say that Twitter can be a great tool to receive news bits on the fly, but I simply can’t rely on Twitter’s transience. The way I want my feeds is all about redundancy.

Passive intake

More than a dual-monitor setup, I have a dual-computer setup. On the left of my main monitor, I have a second monitor, a big 22″ acrylic Cinema Display, which is attached to my trusty Power Mac G4 Cube. Its main function is to offer additional information in my field of vision. Stuff I can glance at every now and then without having to leave my workspace in the MacBook Pro by jumping to other applications. The Cube displays RSS feeds and my Twitter stream all day long, and the monitor isn’t close enough as to divert my attention every two minutes. Since the Cube runs Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger, my software options for RSS feeds are somewhat limited. I decided to use one of the last versions of NetNewsWire that’s fully compatible with Tiger. That version (3.1.7) was the last before NetNewsWire started featuring Google Reader synchronisation, but it’s not a problem for me, since this isn’t the only way I get my feeds. 

Active management

That solution is perfect for my ‘passive’ intake of news feeds. When I need to actively read articles and do something about them, like linking to them in my blog, putting them away for future reference, or citing and responding to them in one of my articles, I do that on my MacBook Pro using Reeder. Reeder has everything I need: an interface that is beautiful to look at and interact with, Google Reader syncing, lots of sharing tools. Now that it has a “Post with MarsEdit” option, it’s even better, since I use MarsEdit for all my blogging. 

Thanks to Reeder’s pleasant interface, I often find myself reading entire articles without leaving the application. (My preferred font for reading in Reeder is Neuzeit S LT Std Book at 16 pt.) Reeder makes that easy thanks to its Readability integration and built-in browser. Reeder has also become the sole RSS reader on my iPhone.

A broader view

I have a lot of interests, and for that reason I need to compartmentalise when it comes to news feeds. If I put all the sites I’m subscribed to in my main feed readers, the situation would get out of control pretty soon. The feeds I have in NetNewsWire and Reeder are a selection of websites & blogs about technology, design and typography. However, sometimes I’d like to stay up-to-date with broader topics. Sometimes I’d like to be able to open a virtual newspaper and read stuff from other sources such as The New York Times, The Guardian, Wired, etc. For that, Pulp is perfect. It even has an iPad version I can’t wait to try as soon as I purchase an iPad.

Finally, one last place I keep some RSS subscriptions is Mail.app. There are sites like Mac OS X Hints or Apple’s Mac OS X Knowledge Base for which I want to have an archive where I keep all headlines since I subscribed, and quickly look up information as needed. For this task, I think that Mail is excellent, more so under OS X Lion, since the Spotlight search facility has improved a bit.

How about RSS feed bankruptcy?

In my case it’s a non-problem. Some people have an uneasy relationship with their RSS feed reading: they say they’re overwhelmed by the increasing unread items count, that they’re anxious to reach some sort of ‘Inbox Zero’ peace of mind. I find that a bit amusing. For me, it’s obvious that with this constant flow (overflow) of information, you have to skim. No one buys a newspaper and starts reading every article from the first page to the last. Not every news bit gets my attention or interest. With the number of sites I follow, I would be on my RSS feeds reader all day! I currently have 809 unread items in NetNewsWire: it’s an inflated and ultimately meaningless datum. I’ll probably read in full just 30 of those 809 articles over the weekend, and then I shall ‘Mark All Read’. If I feel I’ve been too hasty, I can go back and skim some more as soon as I have some time for that. It’s that simple, really.

Beelog: a new Tumblr client

Software

Source: Beelog: a new Tumblr app for Mac | Wind on a Leaf

David Chartier has found (and now tried) an interesting Tumblr client on the Mac App Store. His impressions:

I just took it for a whirl and, so far, really like it. The reading experience isn’t quite as seamless as just scrolling the Dashboard at Tumblr.com, but there are lots of handy features and clever interface choices for both sides of Tumblr: reading and posting. It has a menu bar item that can automatically refresh your Dashboard and display an unread count, and a healthy dose of preferences let you do everything from pick a default post type and state (publish now or add to queue) to change the default font for reading posts. So far, I’m even more confident Beelog is well worth its price.

By examining the screenshots, Beelog’s UI is heavily inspired by Tweetie/Twitter and Sparrow for the sidebar, and Reeder for the merged title bar/toolbar. Which means I like it. I’ll very likely purchase it myself and if I do, I’ll share my thoughts here. For 10 dollars (or 7.99 Euros), it can be a painless impulse purchase…

The NeXT Logo book

Handpicked

#alttext#

Source: Paul Rand + Steve Jobs — Imprint-The Online Community for Graphic Designers

Hat tip to Carlo Gandolfi who pointed me to this article. I just love all things NeXT, and the company logo is my second favourite after the original rainbow Apple logo. 

In 1986 Jobs approached Rand to design the logo for his NeXT educational computer company. After obtaining permission from IBM, Jobs offered Rand a handsome sum to develop a logo for a product that was not yet public. The only thing Rand knew was that the mysterious NeXT computer was a black cube.

Paul Rand’s resulting NeXT Logo book — whose scans you can see in the article — is a piece of design art itself.

Rand:

It is desirable to keep the letter style simple, unmannered, and untrendy so as not to distract from the cube concept. Furthermore, the use of a single identification device and a simple sans serif letter, designed to harmonize with almost any accompanying typeface, is essential for practical application. 

Sound advice even outside the NeXT logo context, of course.

The Amazing Type-Writer

Handpicked

#alttext#

This is seriously cool. 

Sharing your snapshots after applying vintage filters emulating that film camera look is so last year. How about sharing your thoughts, jokes, notes, poems written in small cards with a virtual typewriter?

You can, with The Amazing Type-Writer!

As you can see from the photo above, the result is quite realistic and effective. What’s more, the whole typing experience is. When you finish typing a note, you can save it as a photo in your Camera Roll, email it, or post it to the Public Gallery. After you posted it publicly, you can retrieve the card’s link and share it on Twitter, for instance.

One clever twist: unlike with photo sharing apps (such as Instagram), your public note can be ‘mimeographed’ (copied) by others, who can modify it by adding their contribution and reissuing the card in the Public Gallery again. You can do the same with other people’s cards, of course.

I’ve started publishing one short poem per day. Go find your ritual, and enjoy.

$1.99 / €1.59 on the App Store.

(Via John Gruber)

Comments are closed

Tech Life

Starting today, comments on this website are disabled. And hopefully this will put an end to a saga that has been going on for a long time. It is a difficult decision, mind you. It’s something I’ve been pondering for a while, because I have always valued comments. I have always valued a healthy debate and feedback. And criticism, when constructive & generally intelligent.

When I was about to launch this site three months ago, I was coming from a somewhat disappointing experience with comments back at the old quarters of The Quillink Observer, and I was quite close to start this new place without a comment system. But then I thought about the few good people who had shown me that smart, intelligent, compelling commentary was possible. So I enabled comments. I even gave them a rather prominent section on my Main Page to show that I actually cared about them.

The dark side

There is a dark side to comments, however. The side where spammers, trolls and idiots live and prosper. Give people a box where they can write what they want, protected by some layer of anonymity, and they will be mean. Sometimes they just want to scratch an itch, like when people scribble nonsense on a wall just because they can, just for kicks, just for patting themselves on their back: Ha, I did it! This kind of commenter is generally annoying but harmless. It’s an inch over the automated spam level. Then there are malicious commenters: those who aggressively attack you or what you’ve written, and they do so in a way that prevents a constructive exchange of views and opinions.

Then there are those whom I refer to as ‘chess players’. Those who like to play a game with you. Their degree of malice is higher, because they’re neither idiots, nor hot-headed. They start provoking you apparently out of spite: they’re really evaluating you. They want to know if you can be a worthy adversary. You can’t write to them privately, because they don’t leave a valid email address in the comment section. I just have their IP. Sometimes they try to circumvent comment moderation by commenting from another place with a different IP. Sometimes they feign adulation hoping that I’ll approve their comment, and so on and so forth. Some do this for the game itself, they get a kick out of it. Some hold a mysterious grudge against me and this game is their twisted way of retaliating. (Dudes, just cut the crap and write me a letter telling me what the problem is). Some view this game as a (peculiar) way to earn their trust.

My place, my ways

There is a problem, though. This is my ‘home’, and you don’t get to play your games and by your rules in someone else’s place. These people are abusing tools I have made available for everyone out of courtesy. The only thing I’ve ever asked since I started writing online was respect. I have been sharing my views about technology & design for a while, and gave readers a quick way to publish their input, their feedback, their thoughts. Some did, and brilliantly so, and I thank them from the bottom of my heart. Others just behaved mindlessly, maliciously, without respecting me or my work. They are digital hooligans. They just love to trash public places and tagging the walls.

No, they haven’t won

You may think that, by closing comments on my website, I’m admitting defeat. You may think that my hand has been forced, and that the trolls and the idiots have won. They haven’t, but they’re free to think so. Verily, I’ve always had a conflicted relationship with comments. When Marco Arment wrote this post on comments last year, that relationship got even more conflicted, because on one side I fully agree with him, on the other I still have (some) faith in (some) people. He wrote:

I don’t see my writing as a collaborative effort, and I don’t see my site as a community in which I need to enable internal discussion via comments.

I also disagree with the widespread notion that comments are “discussion”, or that they form a “community”. Discussion and communities require mechanics such as listening and following up that are rarely present in comments. […]

A blog post is a one-to-many broadcast. Comments are the opposite: many-to-one feedback. […] If comments are behaving as many-to-one feedback, there’s minimal value to showing them to the world, because the world largely doesn’t read them. But the act of showing them to the world — your world, not the commenters’ — creates a setting in which commenters are encouraged to behave negatively.

We already have a widespread many-to-one feedback medium that avoids this: email. So that’s the feedback system that I allow on my site. Anyone can email me, and I will read it.

Those who truly want to start a discussion usually have their own blogs, so they can write their commentary to their audience. […]

Given that this site represents me, and I’ve earned an audience over a very long time of people who generously allow me to take tiny slices of their attention on a regular basis, I don’t think that tightly controlling its content is unfair.

(These are the most significant excerpts for me, but please read Arment’s whole post.)

However, at the time Arment wrote that, I was still publishing my writings from a free platform. Now that I’ve paid for registering this domain, paid for the hosting service; now that I have a hopefully recognisable online identity, I think the time has finally come to take feedback and commentary to the next step.

The next step is simple and easy

You want to give me feedback? Write me an email. If you really have the urge to let me know what you think, I’m sure you won’t mind taking the small extra effort of opening your email client and write. If you want to start a longer, public discussion, write on your own blog – create one if you haven’t got one — and let the world know what are your thoughts on the matter. I have read many interesting, smart, and civil exchanges where people referenced one another in their blogs, at times building up an excellent debate while avoiding stupid, inflammatory comments.

I’m tired of lifting all the weight here. It takes time to research information, to write an article, to take care of comment moderation. It takes nothing to scribble a mean comment in a box. It’s time you do your part of the effort.