Ten years gone

Et Cetera

I started writing this at the beginning of March, then I stopped and put it aside because I was overwhelmed by work. Then it turned into a long rant and I thought it didn’t have the right tone. So, after basically rewriting it from scratch, I’m finally publishing it. It’s still a bit of a rant, but I had to get some things out of my system, so to speak.

March 5, 2011, was a personal anniversary: ten years of online writing. The overall feeling is that of having experienced a bittersweet ride so far, with the percentages of bitter and sweet being roughly 65 and 35 respectively. So yes, after ten years the taste in my mouth is definitely more bitter than anything, although that 35% of sweet has been really, really sweet and I’m not belittling it at all.

2001: A little personal Odyssey

The year 2001 was somewhat important for me. It was a year of many changes, starting from the first big move: my parents went to live somewhere else, in a little house they bought in Tuscany, while I remained alone in what had been my grandparents’ flat for 20 years, from 1981 to 2001. It was a time of personal growth, which meant a mixture of excitement (for finally having a flat all for myself) and fear, worry and stress (I did not have a proper job, I was starting to freelance for real, my parents went away in July and paid my rent until September).

The previous ten years, from 1991 to 2001, are what I still consider my literary formative years — they are, by far, the period in my life in which I read and wrote most. I wanted to be a Writer, and since I was studying the liberal arts at the university, I had plenty of inspiration — and, more importantly, time — to write. So I wrote: plenty of short stories, a short novel and a long one, and plenty, plenty of poems. Poetry was extremely important for me: it was both of a confessional nature and of a more experimental one. Certain poems were my true, naked voice that only talked to me; others were descriptions, musings, explorations using the language of poetry, which I still think it’s the most powerful of all. Those who frequented me at the time know I was truly madly deeply serious about it, and I loved to talk about it, to read my poetry aloud (there were also live performances, accompanied by some friends of mine who are professional musicians). I like to remember those years as my personal ‘Beatnik’ era.

I’ve always been quite proficient in English, having studied it since I was 4. So, after some personal projects involving literary translations in 1994–1996, in late 2000/early 2001 I began doing translations professionally (mostly technical stuff). Soon enough I realised the main downside of my job: it messed up my daily schedule and ‘personal rhythm’ pretty badly. But most of all, it made me suffer a long, painful, creativity drought.

The big change in writing, at the beginning of 2001, wasn’t that I stopped writing. On the contrary, I began writing more. However, 90% of it was not creating, but translating. The other 10% was a mix of reporting and creating. Yes, reporting: my first example of online writing was, in fact, a journal. A journal that I kept updating on a fairly regular basis until 2006, though it began overlapping with a proper blog I had started in 2005 (Autoritratto con mele, in Italian), and so updates to the old journal became more and more intermittent, and now I post there very rarely.

So, to summarise, my writing timeline looks something like this:

  • • 1984–1989 — The Early Years: first attempts at poetry after writing some lyrics for a band when I was in high school. Most of what I wrote in this 5‑year period was in English.
  • • 1990–1992 — Discovering prose; first short stories in Italian, then more serious poetry, both in English and Italian. First project for a novel, Richard Martyn started in 1992. Most of the work produced at this time was designed, printed and distributed by myself, and that led to the idea of starting a microscopic ‘publishing project’ called Laboratorio Quillink which, in more recent years, has become Quillink Press.
  • • 1992–2000 — My most writing-intense years, and I really mean intense: dozens of short stories, mainly in Italian but also in English, lots of projects and attempts at finding different ways to make my work known, including jazz readings and theatre (I began writing a play, but the project was abandoned).
  • • 2001–2009 — Years of crisis, creative drought, writer’s block, general impasse. Most notable work was a small collection of poems in English written between 2003 and 2005, called Collapsars. At the same time, these are the years in which another kind of writing started growing and maturing, mainly thanks to all the translation work I’ve been doing since 2001: technical writing. From 2005–2006 I’ve been more and more active online, mostly writing tech- and Mac-related blogs: the aforementioned Autoritratto con mele (Italian), started in 2005; then The Rizland Observer (English), started in 2007 — both blogs were then merged in 2010 to form The Quillink Observer [officially closed in July 2011 after starting this website]. In 2008 came System Folder, a blog about vintage Macs and the classic Mac OS. While more creative efforts were made first in 2007, when I started Crosslines, an idea for a sort of ‘interactive webfiction’ (the project is currently in the freezer, waiting to be re-engineered and properly relaunched). Then, in 2010 I started a couple of small tumblelogs, Neoglossary (just a fun thing about neologisms and invented words) and Type Happens (a photoblog on found type).
  • • 2009-present — Creative writing and inspiration slowly returning; abandoned novels and projects are being dealt with, either by revivification or by leaving the past behind and starting afresh. My latest production is in English for the most part.

Read More

The problem with menubar icons

Software

Look at your menubar icons, there on the top-right corner of your screen. How many do you have? If you’re a new Mac user, probably not many — I’m guessing Spotlight (by default), the clock, the battery indicator if you have a laptop, the volume icon, the AirPort icon, and perhaps the Bluetooth and Spaces icons, if you use such features.

If you’re an experienced Mac user, or just a long-time user who likes to keep up with all those useful utilities written by lots of smart Mac developers, the right side of your menubar will get increasingly crowded. Not a big deal if you work on a 20-inch display. Problematic if your main Mac is a 13-inch MacBook / MacBook Pro / MacBook Air, or worse if it’s an 11-inch MacBook Air. 

It’s easy to see why a lot of utilities want to put an icon there. The menubar is the only interface element on the Mac that is always visible (unless, of course, you’re using some application in full-screen mode), and the position of the icons there allows for a quick and easy access to any functionality they may provide. The problem, of course, is that the menubar is a finite space, and if you use a lot of third-party applications that put an icon there — either temporarily (as long as the application is open) or permanently (the application is meant to be active at login, so it’s basically an always-on process) — you will soon have to deal with it, usually by removing those you seem to be using only occasionally. 

On smaller screens this isn’t a very comfortable scenario, and even with a 15-inch screen the situation might pose a problem if you have a lot of menu extras. Firstly, you end up with a cluttered menubar, which in part prevents that quick and easy access those menu extras are made for, and secondly, when you open an application that has a long list of menu commands, they will hide some of the left-most icons, and this is a bit of a usability issue, because they may hide important status information you want to see at all times or prevent you from clicking directly on menu extras you need right away. To see them all again you usually have to switch to the Finder or to another application with fewer menu commands in the menubar.

I believe this situation is better handled on Windows, where the equivalent space in the taskbar on the bottom right of the screen is fixed by default, so only a certain number of icons can be seen all the time, and any icons in excess stay hidden unless you click on a small arrow on the left side, marked with a yellow circle in the figure below: 

Windows Vista taskbar

I think it wouldn’t hurt to have a similar solution on the Mac, with a sort of slider that can be dragged at any time to reveal more icons or even hide them. Such an idea was actually implemented in System 7 and later in System 7.5.x with the Control Strip:

Control strip in Mac OS 9

Although there were some third-party applications that still put icons in the menubar even in the System 7 era, the Control Strip allowed for more flexibility. As the Wikipedia entry says:

The Control Strip always anchors itself to the closest horizontal screen edge (left or right,) but can be freely moved up and down both sides of any display by the user. It defaults to the lower left corner of the primary display on fresh systems.

Users can choose whether to turn the Control Strip on and off and even set a hot key to hide and reveal it using its control panel. Two buttons at either end allow the Strip to be collapsed and expanded (with the one opposite the screen edge also allowing the strip to be resized when dragged), while two more buttons just inside those allow one to scroll through a very full Strip. Holding down the option key while clicking turns the cursor into a distinctive hand shape that allows one to drag the Strip around the screen, rearrange modules within the Strip and drag modules out.

The Control Strip had potential, and I remember missing it a lot when I first switched to Mac OS X. The first Dock in Mac OS X 10.0.x with its Docklings retained part of the Control Strip functionality. See my Tour of Mac OS X 10.0.3 at System Folder — there’s a screenshot showing the Docklings. In that same article I wrote:

By the way, the ‘dockling’ concept wasn’t that bad. With hindsight, using the Dock for status icons could have been a better idea, since the Dock is more expandable and eventually has more room for icons rather than the menu bar. […] [N]o matter how many icons you add to the Dock, it stretches to accommodate all of them and they’re all always visible. 

But I can see why the idea was abandoned: users with a lot of application icons and folder aliases in the Dock would have the same usability problem I was mentioning before: a Dock that is too crowded loses some of its usefulness. Also, a lot of users prefer to hide the dock when not in use, and that isn’t good if your application needs to display some status information all the time.

In the end I think that a feasible solution might be to make the right side of the menubar more versatile, giving it the ‘sliding power’ that the old Control Strip used to have — without the detachability, of course. I think that, even after six major releases, Mac OS X still lacks a bit of flexibility in some portions of its interface.

Nascondere le immagini nei feed RSS in Safari

Mele e appunti

Un suggerimento davvero ottimo da Mac OS X Hints. Vi sarà molto utile se, come me, ogni tanto date un’occhiata veloce ai feed RSS direttamente da Safari; e se, come me, siete sommamente infastiditi dall’abitudine ormai radicata di inserire immagini ovunque, anche e soprattutto quando nel feed compare solo un riassunto dell’articolo. Un caso eclatante è Macworld.com: una riga e mezza di riassunto, un’enorme icona per ogni articolo, che porta via spazio inutilmente e nulla aggiunge al valore dell’articolo.

Il suggerimento che ho trovato su Mac OS X Hints prevede di aprire un editor di testo qualunque (come TextWrangler, gratuito) e scrivere:

@charset "UTF-8"; .apple-rss-article-body img{display:none};

Salvatelo come file CSS (per esempio noimg.css) e mettetelo in un luogo sicuro (il mio si trova nella cartella Documenti nella mia Home). Poi entrate nelle Preferenze di Safari, andate alla sezione Avanzate, e scegliete ‘Altro…’ dal menu a discesa Foglio di stile. Individuate il file CSS che avete appena salvato e selezionatelo. Le immagini dai feed spariranno.

Link: Nascondere le immagini nei feed RSS in Safari

LaCie, nevermore.

Tech Life

It comes in threes

Three months ago, my external 320 GB LaCie Porsche Design hard drive, purchased in 2008, began displaying an odd behaviour. I would turn it on, hear it start, but it would take a suspiciously long time before mounting on my Mac’s desktop. The first time I noticed this, I didn’t give it much weight because I was too busy. The second time, the time lapse before the disk mounted on the desktop was noticeably longer, and it was also accompanied by a series of slight noises suggesting that the drive was having a hard time booting. Now that drive had my full attention: I freed around 60 GB of disk space on another external drive, and I promptly moved my whole iTunes library there. Finally the volume mounted, and that day I put the drive under pressure, to see (and especially hear) any sign of impending failure. Everything worked fine. The third time, two days later, the disk did not mount on the desktop. I didn’t panic: all critical data was already elsewhere, the rest was a mix of redundant and backup material that I could recover with a bit of an effort, but generally it was no big deal. 

When the disk failed to mount on the desktop, I had an intuition of what was happening, and after a quick check by turning the drive off and on again just once, I decided to leave it alone until I had time to deal with it properly. Finally, the day before yesterday (!) I had the opportunity to do so. Here are some observations worth sharing. 

The results of a little investigation

This LaCie Porsche Design drive is the third unit in a LaCie box that has failed on me. The other two ‘dearly departed’ were a 20 GB Pocketdrive unit in 2003 and a d2 160 GB unit in 2008. Granted, it’s three drives in just over seven years, and perhaps not a really significant statistical sample to decide against purchasing LaCie products anymore. Moreover it is known that LaCie basically manufactures the external enclosure and interface, but the hard drives inside are from other brands. The three drives that failed were, in chronological order, an IBM, a Western Digital and a Seagate Barracuda — so why blame LaCie? It’s been the recurrent fault pattern — which manifested in an almost identical manner even this third time — what made me think that the root of the problem lies in the LaCie enclosure and its power circuitry, not in the hard drive itself. 

The dynamics of the failure of the three drives is identical: The drive starts having power-related problems, start-up times are much longer, booting becomes a laborious process, the volume self-unmounts from the Mac’s desktop and re-mounts intermittently, and after a while it appears dead. It turns on but there’s no sound and it does not mount on the desktop. In all three cases, after opening the LaCie enclosure, removing the hard drive inside, and inserting it in another generic enclosure (I own an old but very reliable unit with a FireWire 400 interface), the drive powered on normally, the volume(s) mounted on the desktop immediately and I was able to access my data, but not before having repaired the disk structure with DiskWarrior.

From my empirical observations, here’s what I deduced: the power circuitry in LaCie’s enclosures is the weak link in the chain. I hypothesise that after a while, the power circuitry starts to fail and not provide a stable power supply to the hard drive. In the best case scenario, the drive simply won’t ‘connect’ and therefore the Mac won’t be able to see it or access it. In the worst case scenario, the unstable power (imagine the typical power surge in your home, with lightbulbs flickering) causes the drive’s heads to become equally unstable and corrupt the information on the disk. For this reason in all three cases I was able to recover the data only partially, and DiskWarrior has always reported problems at the directory structure level. In the case of the second LaCie unit (the 160 GB one) and the 320 GB Porsche Design model, which were both divided into two partitions, one of the two partitions always got damaged in the process and even after running the diagnostic and repair tools, it was mounted on the desktop and appeared with less capacity than before (e.g. 55 GB instead of 80), or did not mount at all. 

In short, three different drives, an essentially identical fault pattern. Average hard drive life: never more than three years. The suspicion of planned obsolescence is strong, but for now I’ve decided to reserve my judgment on the matter and just avoid buying a LaCie branded product from now on. I’m very tempted to buy bare hard drives and empty enclosures (or simple accessories such as those produced by NewerTechnology) separately, both manufactured by brands of renown quality. By now I reckon that if a hard drive wrapped in a nice enclosure costs just 70 Euros, in the end you get what you paid for — not much, that is. 

One last note: as I have said many times in the past, I can’t recommend DiskWarrior enough. If you think it’s expensive, you haven’t read this article carefully.

Mai più LaCie

Mele e appunti

E il terzo se ne va

Tre mesi fa il mio disco esterno LaCie Porsche Design da 320 GB acquistato nel 2008 ha cominciato a fare i capricci. Lo accendevo, lo sentivo mettersi in marcia, ma impiegava un tempo sospettosamente lungo prima di montarsi sulla scrivania. La prima volta che ho notato questo comportamento non gli ho dato eccessivamente peso, anche perché ero troppo occupato. La seconda volta, il tempo trascorso prima che il disco si montasse si è allungato, con in più una serie di lievi rumori che suggerivano che il disco stesse facendo fatica a montarsi. Il disco aveva ora tutta la mia attenzione: ho liberato 60 GB su un altro disco esterno, e ho trasferito prontamente tutta la libreria iTunes che tenevo sul LaCie da 320 GB. Quel giorno ho messo il disco sotto pressione, per vedere (e soprattutto sentire) se potevano esserci indizi di guasti imminenti. Il disco funzionava bene. La terza volta, due giorni dopo, non si è montato sulla scrivania. Niente panico: i dati importanti erano già altrove; il resto era un misto di backup ridondanti e di materiale che avrei potuto ricuperare altrove con un po’ di fatica, ma nulla di veramente trascendentale.

Il giorno in cui quel disco non si è montato sulla scrivania del Mac, ho avuto una veloce intuizione di quel che stava accadendo, e dopo uno spegni/riaccendi che mi ha confermato che il disco proprio non voleva montarsi, ho deciso di lasciarlo stare fino a quando avessi avuto tempo di occuparmene con calma. Finalmente l’altroieri (!) ho avuto l’opportunità di farlo. Mi sembra importante condividere alcune osservazioni in merito.

I risultati di una modesta investigazione

Questo LaCie Porsche Design è il terzo disco (in un involucro) LaCie a guastarsi. Prima di lui se ne sono andati nel 2008 uno da 160 GB di quelli simili all’attuale linea d2, in scocche di metallo che poggiano verticalmente sulla scrivania, e nel 2003 un Pocketdrive da 20 GB. Siamo d’accordo, si tratta di tre dischi in poco più di sette anni, e forse è una statistica un po’ misera per decidere di non comprare più questi prodotti. Del resto è noto che LaCie mette la scocca, ma i dischi all’interno sono di altre marche, e i tre dischi che mi si sono guastati erano un IBM, un Western Digital e infine un Seagate; perché dare la colpa a LaCie? È la trama ricorrente del guasto, che si è ripresentata identica anche questa terza volta, a farmi pensare che la radice del problema sta nell’involucro LaCie e non nel disco rigido stesso.

La dinamica del guasto dei tre dischi è identica: il disco inizia a presentare problemi di alimentazione, fatica a mettersi in marcia, si smonta da solo dalla scrivania per poi rimontarsi in maniera intermittente, e dopo poco appare morto. Si accende, ma non emette suoni e non si monta sulla scrivania. In tutti e tre i casi, aprendo l’involucro LaCie, estraendo il disco al suo interno, e inserendolo in un altro involucro in mio possesso, una vecchia ma affidabilissima unità con interfaccia FireWire 400, il disco all’accensione si è montato immediatamente e ho potuto nuovamente accedere ai miei dati, non prima però di averlo riparato con DiskWarrior.

(Nel mio articolo Lo Zen e l’arte del recupero dei dati del novembre 2008 ho scritto una cosa che si è rivelata inesatta. A quel tempo credevo che con il vecchio Pocketdrive LaCie da 20 GB si fosse guastato prima il disco, ma da prove incrociate successive eseguite nel 2010 ho potuto stabilire che anche il quel caso il problema derivava dall’alimentazione dell’involucro: l’IBM Travelstar ivi contenuto ha funzionato benissimo dopo il trapianto in un PowerBook Titanium, e un altro disco che sapevo funzionare bene, quando inserito nell’involucro LaCie, presentava gli stessi problemi del disco originario).

Dalle mie osservazioni empiriche ho dedotto quanto segue: il circuito di alimentazione degli involucri LaCie è l’anello debole della catena. Ipotizzo che, dopo un certo tempo, cominci a cedere e a non fornire al disco un’alimentazione stabile. Nel migliore dei casi questo fa sì che il disco semplicemente non si ‘accenda’ e quindi non sia visibile dal Mac. Nel peggiore dei casi, l’alimentazione instabile (pensiamo ai classici sbalzi di corrente) fa in modo che le testine del disco diventino altrettanto ‘instabili’ e corrompano le informazioni sul disco. Per questo in tutti e tre i casi ho potuto ricuperare i dati solo parzialmente, e DiskWarrior ha sempre notificato problemi a livello di directory e registri del disco. Nel caso del secondo LaCie (quello da 160 GB) e di quest’ultimo Porsche Design, entrambi divisi in due partizioni, una delle due partizioni si è sempre danneggiata nel processo, e anche dopo la diagnostica e la riparazione compariva di minor capacità rispetto a prima (esempio: 55 GB invece di 80), oppure non compariva del tutto.

Insomma, tre dischi diversi, dinamica del guasto sostanzialmente identica. Vita media del disco non superiore a tre anni. Il sospetto di obsolescenza programmata è forte, ma a riguardo sospendo il giudizio. Mi limito semplicemente a evitare di acquistare un prodotto LaCie d’ora innanzi. Sono molto tentato di acquistare dischi rigidi nudi e crudi e involucri (o semplici interfacce come quelle prodotte da NewerTechnology), entrambi di marche riconosciute e di qualità. E sono ormai dell’idea che forse un involucro + disco che costa 70 Euro, alla fine, valga altrettanto poco.

Ah, dimenticavo: come ho già avuto modo di dire più volte, acquistate DiskWarrior. Se vi sembra caro, significa che non avete letto con attenzione questo articolo.