On distraction and virtual crutches

Software

Roughly a week ago, Mandy Brown spoke a very important truth on Twitter:

If we’re distracted, it’s not because we’re surrounded by devices that demand attention — it’s because we lack the willpower to turn them off.

Lately, observing the geeks I usually follow (in my RSS feeds, on Twitter, etc.), I have noticed a tendency to rely a lot on various small utilities that are supposed to shape our productivity somehow. Or rather, to shape the way we should be productive. These aren’t bad tools, per se: they do their best to target the infamous issues of this Age of the Geek: distraction and short attention span, often induced by the constant incoming stream of hyper-information. There are To-Do utilities, both for the Mac and for iOS devices; applications that help you focus on the task at hand by creating a ‘distraction-free’ environment, like WriteRoom and Ommwriter Dana for writing, or more general applications like Concentrate and Think; programs that actually block access to certain websites or to your Internet connection for a predetermined amount of time, like SelfControl; and then reminders, planners, assistants, all kinds of applications. You’ve been there, you know what I’m talking about.

Well, here’s a shocker: I do not use any of them. Again, it’s not because I think they’re not effective or efficient — I’m sure they are. It’s just because, for me, they end up being another potentially disruptive layer for my attention and concentration. But also because they’re not ‘educative’ or ‘corrective’; they’re supportive, and I believe they quickly become crutches. They patch the problem at hand (distraction, lack of concentration and focus), but they don’t eradicate it or help the chronically distracted do something for their distraction. I don’t want to be dependent from software crutches to be productive and get things done. I want to act myself, be in control, prevent my brain from getting too lazy, ill-organised, forgetful. For how I function, the recipe is really simple and well summarised by Mandy Brown’s tweet above. It’s a matter of will power. I know what gets me distracted while I have work to do and I have learnt to switch it off without remorse.

This past week has been hectic, and I had a lot to do. Two deadlines were inexorably approaching and I needed unbroken slabs of time. I closed my email clients and RSS readers — together they are far more distracting than checking Twitter every now and then, at least for me. I put the Cube to sleep so I couldn’t routinely glance at the other monitor. This was well enough to keep my focus at a satisfying, productive level. I usually waited to check my email until I needed a break. I would get up from my desk, go brew some coffee, and check my crucial email accounts on my iPhone. I didn’t need to have any software blocking any website, I didn’t have to disconnect from the Internet, and so on. I finished my work on time, and I ended up feeling less tired than I thought. But most of all, I felt focussed and in control.

I know, the highest act of will power would be to leave all applications open as usual, and practice the ultimate discipline of ignoring their noise. I’m getting there, one step at a time…

Aggiornamento ignorato

Mele e appunti

Aggiornare a iWork 9.0.4 non è stato automatico

L’altro giorno è accaduta una cosa che penso valga la pena riferire nel caso possa tornare utile ad altri. Per lavoro, ho dovuto aprire Keynote (un programma che uso assai raramente), e sono subito stato accolto da un messaggio che mi avvertiva della presenza di un aggiornamento — la versione 5.0.4 — e di lanciare Aggiornamento Software se volevo procedere. Avviato Aggiornamento Software, dopo il classico controllo iniziale, il programma mi informava che non vi erano aggiornamenti disponibili per il mio computer. Per curiosità, ho aperto anche Pages e Numbers, e anche loro mi avvertivano della disponibilità di una versione aggiornata, la 4.0.4 e la 2.0.4 rispettivamente. Ma Aggiornamento Software continuava a fare lo gnorri.

Per me, tenere aggiornato il Mac è un’operazione meccanica, automatica. Ero quindi convinto di aver già aggiornato iWork all’ultima versione 9.0.4, specie dopo aver letto una serie di notizie che sottolineavano come Apple avesse aggiunto la funzione di esportare in formato ePub dentro l’ultima versione di Pages, la 4.0.4. Perplesso dal comportamento di Aggiornamento Software, ho deciso di scaricare manualmente l’aggiornamento di iWork dal sito Apple e di procedere a installarlo per conto mio. Scaricato il pacchetto, fatto doppio clic, partiva Installer. Dopo qualche secondo, Installer mi avvisava di non aver trovato nessuna versione di Keynote, Pages o Numbers da poter aggiornare nella cartella iWork ’09. Mistero.

Avendo iWork ’09 anche sul mio Power Mac G4 Cube, ho lanciato Aggiornamento Software sul Cube, che mi ha prontamente avvertito della disponibilità di Safari 4.1.2 e di iWork Update 9.0.4. Dopo aver dato conferma, l’installazione di entrambi gli elementi, sul Cube, è andata a buon fine. 

Guidato da un sospetto, passo al Finder in entrambi i Mac e navigo fino alla cartella Applicazioni. Sul Cube la cartella della suite iWork si chiamava iWork ’09, sul MacBook Pro semplicemente iWork. Ho rinominato iWork in iWork ’09, rilanciato l’Installer sul MacBook Pro e l’aggiornamento è andato a buon fine. Non so perché sul MacBook Pro la cartella si chiamasse soltanto iWork, forse l’avevo rinominata io per errore, ma sta di fatto che se non mi fossi accorto di questa discrepanza, con tutta probabilità iWork avrebbe smesso di aggiornarsi e di essere rilevato da Aggiornamento Software. Fate quindi attenzione a come si chiama la cartella di iWork, non spostatela e non cambiatele nome. 

Un dubbio rimane, comunque: come mai fino alla versione 9.0.3 gli aggiornamenti di iWork si sono regolarmente installati?

Attenzione a troncare

Mele e appunti

La figura mostra una porzione dell’interfaccia di Google Chrome per Mac: quando si effettua il download di uno o più file dal Web, in Google Chrome appare una barra di stato in basso che permette di accedere ai vari file. Nell’angolo a destra ecco la scritta in figura. Si noti che la parola troncata Mostra tutti i downloa… occupa più spazio che non Mostra tutti i download.

Sono dettagli, ma i dettagli contano.

iOS 4.1 on an iPhone 3G

Software

As Steve Jobs announced at the keynote on September 1, the iOS 4.1 update (released last Wednesday), among other fixes and new features also addresses the performance problems affecting the iPhone 3G. From what I’ve gathered, after the original iOS 4 update, the overall performance on the iPhone 3G kind of went downhill, but not in the same way for everyone. I was rather surprised to hear that for some iPhone 3G users their device had basically become ‘unusable’. Yes, I noticed some degradation on mine, but not system-wide, and not consistently. Sometimes things would get remarkably better after a force-reboot, other times it was enough to clear some caches and do a sync with iTunes. And more importantly — as I wrote in July:

As more and more apps were updated and made iOS 4‑compatible by their respective developers, I couldn’t help but notice (wait for it) a progressive performance improvement. The iPhone keeps feeling snappier. Transitions and animations are smoother, more apps seem to open a tad faster than before, the virtual keyboard feels more responsive, and (again, wait for it) the iBooks app itself has mysteriously improved to the point of being actually usable.

Of course, when you start getting used to a certain performance degree, you tend to be a bit forgiving with what we may call ‘minor annoyances’. Having a usable iPhone is better than having an unusable one, but it’s not at all like having an optimal user experience. I didn’t stay on iOS 3.1.x and I refused to downgrade to it because I thought that the improvements brought by iOS 4 were worth the upgrade, especially the ability to have folders and a unified mailbox view. So I accepted the tradeoff of having a slightly less responsive iPhone 3G.

After a week with iOS 4.1, I can safely say that performance and responsiveness are back to iOS 3 times. In particular, I’ve noticed the following:

  • The iPhone 3G boot time seems shorter. There were times before when it seemed it was taking forever to go from the Apple logo to the Springboard.
  • UI animations and transitions are smooth once again. I mean, really smooth. This is especially true for the animation effect on big sliders like Slide to unlock, Slide to power off, etc. The responsiveness of such sliders has once again improved and they actually move with your finger like they used to.
  • The virtual keyboard is back to being snappy. Before iOS 4.1, this was one of the annoyances that were quickly getting frustrating. In whatever app I was (even in the Spotlight search interface), the keyboard just couldn’t keep up with my typing, at least visually. I would type three or four letters with no animation at all on the virtual keys (thus I didn’t know if I had tapped the right letters), I would pause for a second, and then watch the letters being entered all at once with an irksome delay. Now this appears to be fixed for good.
  • Apps (especially the built-in ones, especially Settings) open faster than before, and they close instantly when you tell them to, without delays or animation hiccups.
  • Scrolling is smooth again. Before iOS 4.1, flipping my finger on a long list to scroll faster resulted in awkward pauses and staggerings of the interface. This didn’t happen regularly, but boy was it annoying when it did.
  • Generally speaking, all gestures are now performed instantly and without delays: pinching, reverse-pinching, double tapping, swiping… All is back to normal.

If you own an iPhone 3G and haven’t updated to iOS 4.1 yet, I recommend you do. I don’t think you’ll be disappointed.

RSS readers and Mac OS X 10.4

Software

Recently, on Twitter, my friend Brando asked about the state of RSS readers on Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger. Are there still standalone applications supporting Tiger for RSS feed management?

I know, some people’s reaction may be Who cares about Mac OS X 10.4? Upgrade your Mac, already! It’s not a matter of upgrading: for instance, my main machine is only one year old and fully upgraded to Mac OS X 10.6, but there are many Mac users who have slightly older machines that aren’t obsolete yet and can still perform a lot of other duties. Typically these Macs are old PowerPC G4s which do not support Mac OS X 10.5 or, when they meet the minimum requirements for running Mac OS X 10.5, they do so at the price of poor, disappointing performance.

I have a few of these Macs in my home network, and they still serve me well, especially the PowerMac G4 Cube at my side. With the vintage but still beautiful acrylic 22-inch Cinema Display attached to it, the Cube is perfect for displaying information I want to glance at while I work. I also use it to check a couple of low-traffic email accounts; to open additional browser windows in Safari when the browsers I have open on my main MacBook Pro get too crowded; to listen to music (I have a separate iTunes library on the Cube entirely dedicated to classical music); and of course to check my Twitter stream and the RSS feeds. Therefore, it makes sense for me — and for other people who use a similar setup — to worry about Mac OS X 10.4 support in the third-party applications I use.

Back to RSS readers, my two favourite ones, NetNewsWire and Vienna have both dropped support for Mac OS X 10.4 in their latest versions (3.2.7 and 2.5.x respectively), and now they require at least Mac OS X 10.5 to run. If you search for them in other Mac software download websites, you may encounter misleading pieces of information, for example that they require “Mac OS X 10.4 or higher”. It’s wrong, they won’t even open under Tiger. Another well-known RSS reader which has gone Mac OS X 10.5 or higher is NewsFire.

If you’re not interested in syncing your feeds with Google Reader, then in my opinion and experience your best option is to use an older version of NetNewsWire. The last version supporting Tiger is 3.1.7 (you can download it here). Although it isn’t developed anymore, it’s stable, free, without ads, and runs smoothly on my Cube (a G4/450MHz machine). Similarly, you can also use an older (pre‑2.4) version of Vienna — see here for a list of downloadable versions.

A nod to those who still use Mac OS X 10.3 Panther: NetNewsWire 2.1.5 and Vienna 2.2.2.2212 are the versions you have to look for, respectively. I use the former on my blueberry clamshell iBook G3/300 and it works fine.

A couple of RSS readers that are still under active development and support Mac OS X 10.4 are NewsLife and Shrook. The first is shareware (£7.50 / €10 / $12), the second is free. I haven’t tested either, but from the screenshots and the information available on their sites, they don’t look so bad.

I also received a nice tip on Twitter, from my friend Grant Hutchinson: you can also use Thunderbird as a standalone RSS reader. I hadn’t even thought about Thunderbird because after attempting to use it as an email client when version 2 debuted, I was disappointed and underwhelmed by its performance, so I deleted it and forgot about it entirely. You read me right: it’s not necessary to set up email accounts in Thunderbird to use it as a RSS reader, you just create a new RSS ‘profile’ and add your favourite feeds or import them from another RSS reader in OPML format.

Then, of course, there’s the option of reading RSS feeds inside a browser, especially if you don’t follow a large number of feeds. Safari is still supported in Mac OS X 10.4 (Apple just released version 4.1.2) and it’s probably the best choice. Another less obvious option is to use Opera. I said ‘less obvious’ because at first glance, Opera doesn’t seem to be able to manage feeds, but it actually does. This page in the Support area is quite helpful and well written. There’s only one thing that needs further clarification: in the aforelinked help page, you’ll read that:

The first time you subscribe to a feed, the Feeds item is added to Opera’s menu bar, and a “Feeds” heading appears in your Mail panel if you have set up one or more email or news accounts.

Which is true, but you’ll have to restart Opera to actually see the Feeds menu.

Opera displays and handles feeds like email messages; in my limited testing, this can be a bit confusing, especially if you have a long list of feeds and you select Feeds > Read feeds. You’ll be presented with a very long list of ‘messages’ and, since Opera treats them as emails, instead of seeing the source of a feed, you’ll see the name of the author of the article. This is somewhat bewildering unless you choose to display all articles from a single source by individually selecting the source in the Feeds menu. On the bright side, Opera full supports Mac OS X 10.4 and you can install the latest version (10.62) on your Tiger machine without problems. Opera also gives you various options when subscribing to a feed: you can add it to Opera Mail, Opera Portal, Bloglines, Google Reader, My AOL, Netvibes, Windows Live and Yahoo!

If you’re a Google Reader user, perhaps the easiest path is to just use the Web interface. It would be nice to have a program like Fluid to create a Google Reader application with, but sadly Fluid also requires Mac OS X 10.5 or higher. You could try using WebDesktop in a similar way as I did for reading tweets (see Bye for now, Twitterrific) — WebDesktop is a very light and versatile WebKit-based browser: just open it, tell it to load your Google Reader homepage and set it to refresh the page at the time interval of your choice. Then, you can leave it in the background and it’ll do its job without eating too many CPU resources.

These are just a few ideas off the top of my head. If you know of other updated RSS feed readers that still work under Mac OS X 10.4, feel free to add your thoughts and experiences in the comments.